Close, but not exactly. They just break it down to another level. The process in Maine and Nebraska is as follows:
The statewide winner gets 2EC votes.
In each House District, the winner of that district gets one EC vote.
Zev Steinhardt
Close, but not exactly. They just break it down to another level. The process in Maine and Nebraska is as follows:
The statewide winner gets 2EC votes.
In each House District, the winner of that district gets one EC vote.
Zev Steinhardt
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by headshok *
**
You are very wrong. The presidency has not come down to Florida! It is like in a basketball when somebody misses a shot at the end to win the game. People blame that person instead of blaming the idiot who missed a wide open lay in because he tried to dunk from the free throw line. You only say the Florida decided the election because it cam in last. So you can’t say that the electoral college method is bad because it puts the whole country in the hands of one state!!!
Must disagree with you there, Iz-Man. What kind of ‘clout’ does Alaska have? Sure, we have less population than downtown Milwaukee, but I don’t think a presidential candidate has been by since McKinley.
What clout does Alaska have? Well, the ability to decide the presidency, which Alaska had last night. If Alaska had gone to Gore instead of Bush, Gore could win without Florida.
EVERY state yesterday had the presidency in its control, because if Bush wins, he’ll win by only one EC vote.
Thanks for the clarification. That does seem a more quantifiable method for distributing the EC votes than what I had incorrectly assumed…more equitible, as well, in comparison to statewide popular vote. At least a varying district has a voice.
Alaska is different, being overwhelmingly Republican, and far removed geographicly. A three-vote state that is competitive and more conveniently located would get alot more attention.