They’re still advertising those? Their principle subject, the Iraqi soccer team objected in very strong terms. I guess they’re betting on people not knowing that the Iraqi soccer team has condemned the occupation, and stated taht if they weren’t playing, they’d be killing Americans.
That’s not exactly what they said, unless there were further quotes that I didn’t read. Frankly, the Iraqi soccer team members that were interviewed didn’t seem like the brightest bulbs in the world.
Actually, there’s a federal law forbidding anyone from using the Olympics or its logo for political or commercial purposes without express permission from the IOC. But, heeeeyyy! He’s the guy in the white house, so he can do what he wants. :rolleyes:
Cite? There is case law in which the United States Olympic Committee (cravenly and hypocritically) got a permanent injunction against the Gay Olympics, preventing the (now) Gay Games from using the word “Olympics” (while taking no action against the Police Olympics, the Chili Olympics or the Rat Olympics) but I’m not aware of any law as you describe (other than any applicable copyright or trademark law but that’s not specific to the Olympics).
zebra’s finger is on it. There’s no way New York gets the 2012 Games now.
Even Sports Illustrated, in its print editions, only has a brief item saying the Iraqi soccer players object to the ad, not the much-stronger statement of contempt they ran online.
Federal copyright laws have granted the Olympic committee exclusive rights to the term “Olympics.”
I.e., the USOC didn’t do an copyright/trademark application of the term. A special Federal law was written to (retroactively) assign them the term. (As well as other secondary terms and logos.)
Commericial use of such IP is therefore clearly wrong. The USOC has routinely gone after people they felt were violating their IP. IMHO, a political ad is just a commercial selling a politician, no difference.
If the shoe was on the other foot, this would be a major “talking point” on talk radio for the next 2 weeks. Instead, most people won’t even hear about it.
I hate to say it, but I think New York is a shoo in. They got the US site because of Sept. 11. I think US television will dictate a US games in 2012. They have been stuck with Sydney, Athens, and Beijing which are all bad (time zone wise) for US television. I think US TV (not sure if NBC has the contract) will demand a US games.
The selection of sites for the Olympics is about 90% politics.
Whatever sympathy the US had because of 9/11 is gone now, thanks to the war. Even before the ad ran, the odds were greatly against New York (or any American city) being selected. Also, the US had the Atlanta games not too long ago, so there is probably a sense that the US isn’t “due” yet.
They may be more active now but back when they were going after the Gay Olympics they were pretty nasty about it, including putting a lien on the house of the Gay Olympics organizer while he was otherwise engaged dying of AIDS.
ok, I just remember our dormitory getting threatening letters from them back in '92 because we had some kind of environmental awareness program called the ecolympics. We changed it pretty quickly, but who knows what would have happened if we’d tried to fight it.