"But not under oath"

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/20/us.attorneys.firings/index.html

Fuck me. Why else would they refuse to testify under oath except to be able to lie and NOT go to jail? I cannot fucking stand this administration’s insistence that they are allowed to do anything they want. Can anyone imagine the republicans letting Clinton testify about Monica “not under oath”? I think fucking not.

Yeah, that’s pretty sketchy.

edit:

Furthermore, wtf does this mean?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/20/politics/main2587013.shtml

"A defiant President Bush warned Democrats Tuesday to accept his offer to have top aides testify about the firings of federal prosecutors only privately and not under oath or risk a constitutional showdown from which he would not back down. "

A “constitutional showdown”?

What is that?

All the folks here are pretty ticked. Or most anyway.

All together now:

If You’ve Done Nothing Wrong, You’ve Got Nothing To Worry About!

Sucks when that bites you in the ass, doesn’t it?

That’s where Bush tries to gun down the Constitution and finally kill it off.

One is enough.