It was an inside-job conspiracy–Davis and DaSilva opened the accounts and placed the bets, and Harn was their man on the inside at Autotote, where he worked as a computer programmer. After the bets were placed the day of the race, Harn went in to work–and on a day when he wasn’t scheduled to work, so everybody saw him and wondered, “Hey, what’s Harn doing here on a Saturday?”–and he accessed the Autotote system. The Tribune has a nifty chart in the print edition that notes, “Officials suspect the three tapped into the betting computers after the first four races and changed the bets to match the winning results.” Gee, what a cool idea. Let’s just change the computer. Nobody will ever notice. Except that this is a Three Stooges skit, so…
Um, yeah. As soon as the race is over, the Suits realize, “Hey, what are the odds that one person could be holding, not two or three, but 114 winning tickets?”
No kidding. :rolleyes: My grandma could’ve cracked this one. With her hair still in rollers, too. And before she’d had her coffee.
Yea, I know, I’m continually amazed at the stories I hear “and you thought this was a good idea… why?” One of my personal favorites was the one who set fire to the business to hide the fact that she’d forged some checks off their account (yea, burn the books, the bank will never keep a copy, and they’d like never suspect large sequential checks… )
Yes, I have a hellava lot of sympathy for the business owner who suffered.
By laughing at the stupidity of the crime, I do not in any way, suggest that we should minimize the sense of loss for the victim, nor should we minimize the consequences for the criminal.
(and, yes, of course I know that fires are dangerous and can be life threatening to people etc. I knew the end results of this whole thing, no one was physically hurt, the business owner had insurance and the place wasn’t a total loss and the criminal involved served a hell of a lot of time)