[QUOTE=Fear Itself]
I agree with Otto, so long as both parties know the call is being recorded, it is legal. If one party does not wish to be recorded, they are free to hang up. But I don’t think they can force the other party to terminate the recoding, yet continue the call.
[/QUOTE]
From here:
*"The U.S. federal law allows recording of phone calls and other electronic communications with the consent of at least one party to the call. A majority of the states and territories have adopted wiretapping statutes based on the federal law, although most have also extended the law to cover in-person conversations. 38 states and the D.C. permit recording telephone conversations to which they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing so.
12 states require, under most circumstances, the consent of all parties to a conversation. Those jurisdictions are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington."
*
In particular, California Penal Code Section 632(a) says *“Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished [etc etc]”. *
(All bolding mine).
It seems like consent, not just knowledge of the recording, is required in some states. If a non-consenting party stays on the line and you keep recording, it sounds like it’s still illegal to me.
IANAL, etc.
–KidScruffy