And here, folks, is where I think the heart of the matter lies-why he is afraid to tell us the basis of his ideas.
Anthem (0), what specifically do you mean when you refer to “this timeline”?
actually you’re totally missing what we’re saying. we’re saying there is thisexplanation, which is about the best anyone’s got on the topic. that’s far from anyone saying “we derp don’t know!” that’s just a characterization you are trying to employ to somehow leverage credence.
what *you *are saying is *they *are wrong, and that *you *have more suitable answers. then you act irritated when no one buys into your clap-trap.
what we are saying, over and over and over and over, is why should we listen to you over established science?
what makes your seemingly insane musing worth consideration? who even are you? where did you gain this special knowledge? what makes you more qualified than known experts?
Who are you who is so wise in the ways of science?
oh shit…we’re dealing with a time lord here.
takes half-step back
On another timeline. He only visits this one. He’s registered to vote in a totally different timeline.
No, it’s worse than that.
Anthem (0), where are you from?
In your rush to congratulate yourself I think you are misunderstanding what people are saying. I don’t think anybody on the board disagrees with the fact that almost all the matter and energy in the universe is dark matter and energy. They’re disagreeing with the “we know nothing about 99% of space” comment that you attributed to “science,” when it was actually one scientist saying we know nearly nothing about dark matter (which makes up something close to 99 percent of matter). Meanwhile, most of your OP is still incoherent and it does contain numerous errors that were explained to you by other posters, including Smeghead, Andy L, and Stranger On A Train.
do you even realize that the entirety of that link can be summarized as “we don’t have any idea what it IS, but we do know that it comprises the overwhelming majority of STUFF in the universe, and it doesn’t interact with light.”
Thank you for proving my point for me…though it is disturbing that you evidently didn’t realize you were doing that.
Indeed, and in doing so, all you did was prove my point EXACTLY…which is that science doesn’t KNOW anything about it, other than there’s tons of it everywhere but light doesn’t reflect off of it so we can’t see it at all.
The fact that you didn’t even realize that’s what it’s saying is…just, wow.
what “established science” was in that link you posted? Why would you post a link to something that proves the exact opposite of the point you’re trying to prove?
This is just embarrassing. You post a link which outlines in explicit detail how science knows NOTHING about this theorized substance, then launch into a defense of the depth of scientific understanding on the subject which it admittedly knows nothing about. Then you cap it off by claiming that BECAUSE science doesn’t know anything about it, then clearly I can’t have a theory which explains, and indeed predicts, the existence of dark matter.
Yet this is somehow offensive to you because it isn’t on the wikipedia link which you clearly didn’t read at any rate.
You earlier stated that we live inside of the sun. Science is pretty concrete on the concept of the Sun. Explain how we live inside of the Sun please.
Anthem (0)-what do you mean by “this timeline”, and where/when are you from?
edited to add: The answers to these questions are the keys to understanding what he is talking about, folks.
Sorry, just to summarize the OP… the theory of everything is that the asteroid belt is the point of a cosmic focal point at which that not just light but… everything gets inverted. This is proved because it takes light 42 minutes EXACTLY to get to the asteroid belt, and that only gas giants exist beyond the asteroid belt. Of course this reverts back after another yet-to-be-determined distance because of objects past Neptune, possibly because of dark matter.
And the various doctorates and other scientific professionals on this board have the barest of training and our minds are just puny to begin with.
I have to echo Czarcasm’s demands for the source of education.
Anthem, your use of words like spin, quantum, dimension, etc. are woefully misused even on a HS level.
That’s an interesting variation on the Ad Hominem fallacy, to attack the being from another dimension rather than their argument.
Anthem, I have seen the theories you have posted before and have thoroughly rebutted them on other forums, but I will do so again.
1 - IN and OUT in a contra-definition universe (which we clearly live in) are transposed and become their orthogonal values of between and betwixt (for those new to this model, betwixt is the unitary prime of between for any mathematical operation).
2 - Therefore, the proposed mirror effect stated in the OP, mathematically results in a series of fractal landscapes that converge in a singularity. For particles to exist in this space-time concept would require each particle to have a partner particle of exactly 1/10th the mass.
These particles have never been detected.
You clearly speak his language. What timeline are you from? :dubious:
I completely agree with the OP. Or at least I assume I will once I read it.
Alas, your post leaves me betwixt bafflement, bewilderment and their imaginary orthogonal axial befuddlement. Perhaps Anthem (0) or his derivative operands can furnish me with an explanation in plain English.
Not likely.
Interestingly, that results in the precise coordinates of my dog who ran away from home yesterday. Thank you for finding my dog.
I just felt that we need to pull this statement out for a full examination. It takes 42 minutes to cross infinity. 42 minutes. Infinity. It takes 42 minutes to cross infinity.
That was actually written and submitted.
Why is anyone expecting coherence from this guy again?
Give him a break: Different Ficton–>Different Science and all that.