I still wanna know more about living inside of the sun. Maybe this guy has solved the global warming debate.
It’s not true that we only ever see the outside surface of things. Glassfish, marbles, frogspawn, jellyfish, drinking tumblers, bottles, grapes - with all of these things, and many more, the insides can be seen, and are quite mundane and non-magical.
Not all infinities are the same size. Perhaps Anthem (0) found a particularly small one.
I think that this is either going to involve a new definition of where the sun begins and ends, or more of his IN/OUT mumbo-jumbo, which may two ways of saying the same thing.
If you’re used to an area that doesn’t have carpool lanes it can feel like you never arrive. But in areas with carpool lanes, 42 is generally how long it takes.
If you go on foot, 42 is also the number of roads you must walk down.
per wiki:
In 1966, mathematician Paul Cooper theorized that the fastest, most efficient way to travel across continents would be to bore a straight hollow tube directly through the Earth, connecting a set of antipodes, evacuate it (remove the air), and then just fall through.[6] The first half of the journey consists of free-fall acceleration, while the second half consists of an exactly equal deceleration. The time for such a journey works out to be 42 minutes. Remarkably, even if the tube does not pass through the exact center of the Earth, the time for a journey powered entirely by gravity (also known as Gravity train) always works out to be 42 minutes, as long as the tube remains friction-free, as while gravity’s force would be lessened, so would the distance traveled at an equal rate.[7][8]
Passenger, meet coriolis force. Face, meet wall.
Electric sun people and overly pedantic jackasses assert that the sun extends to the heliopause. Basically, for lack of a better description, that the solar wind constitutes an “atmosphere”.
I’m strangely excited for this answer and hoping Anthem (0) does not disappear.
Ignorance of the extant theories of time, dark matter, dark energy, or the scientific work being done on those areas does not negate their existence. Just as the Germ Theory of disease came before microscopes which allowed Leeuwenhoek to see the microbes, theories of time, dark matter, and dark energy are in development and, as per the scientific method, competing hypotheses are being tested to create a theory. This is how science works.
Scientific American is the US’s oldest continually published scientific magazine and is quite good at bringing science to the layman. I’d recommend you find a library with a collection and search for articles on time, dark matter, and dark energy. They typically do 3-5 issues a year on those topics. The scientific world is proceeding apace in sussing out the things we don’t yet understand, and doing it with far more rigor and reliability than your approach.
Enjoy,
Steven
He is taking a moment to reflect upon the answer.
I’m not sure why anyone is actually participating in this trainwreck when the OP clearly makes its own nonsense evident.
The “examples” given above are a classic case of cherry picking data. Oooooh! Look! We can make up silly comparisons between four of Jupiter’s satellites and various bodies closer to the sun! Of course, to do that, we have to pretend that the earth’s satellite deserves to be included in such a comparison, while Mercury and Mars are ignored, and the fact that Mars, itself, has two satellites is ignored, the other 63 satellites (or 12 satellites depending on where one makes that count) of Jupiter are ignored, the other gaseous planets are ignored, all their dozens of satellites are ignored, the solid rock of Cllisto becomes “frozen. . .outer space” (as if outer space was other than frozen), etc.
This is the sort of nonsense that a kid might think about atoms and solar systems “mirroring” each other based on comparing the (incorrect, if common) image of an atom as a series of particles in orbit around a nucleus to planets and other debris in orbit around a star while ignoring the facts that the (incorrect) atomic image has the orbits completly enclosing the nucleus while planetary orbits are always close to a plane.
It is just silly.
Of course, this thread also bears out the unbending corollary that people with the wierdest hare-brained ideas are also the ones with the biggest and most hostile egos, always “challenging” everyone to prove them wrong while attempting to taunt those who are willing to engage them for not accepting their new revealed truth.
It is one more Conspiracy Theory taken to a different level. Madame Blavatsky would be so proud.
I logged in just to reply to this. It’s been established that crossing an aleph-one space at aleph-null speed takes exactly 42 minutes subjective. Ref: The collected works of D. Adams. (However, his work only covered aleph-one space; determining whether this holds for crossing aleph-N space at any speed of aleph-null up to aleph-(N-1) is left as an exercise for the advanced student.)
ETA: Forgot about something from page 1. Inverting a dwarf planet across the Kupier belt requires applying the falling giant template. I cordially invite the OP to rebut my assertion.
Yeah, I tried that tact. OP is a large green creature, from the TR-011 dimension, methinks. No other possible reason to drop “your timeline” style references, other than trying to be cute.
And yeah, depending on how he acts in meatspace, I am tending to agree with the schizoid personality diagnosis. 
Anthem, some of your points weren’t clear. You used terminology that didn’t make much sense. You had some good points, and I understand and find your suggestion that we see in only 2 dimensions thought provoking and well thought out.
BUT!
You CANNOT be as derogatory you have been! No one will ever even think about agreeing with you if you continue to be as conceited and vulgar as you have been. Argue your opinions with logic, not vulgarity.
Thanks,
James.
I hate to admit it, but I think I know what the OP means to say. We live in the sun’s fifth dimension, if I have his terminology right. So we’re an orbiting body around the sun the way that Ganymede is an orbiting body of Jupiter. In fact, we’re the analogue planet of Ganymede.
If you and I loved on Ganymede, we would see Jupiter as our sun and the actual Sun would appear to us as a gas giant “planet” and the Earth as a moon around it, because of the inversion that happens at the asteroid belt.
What do you think Anthem (0), do I have it all figured out?
P.S. None of the above is to be construed as agreement, Anthem’s off his meds.
I love on Earth exclusively and it appears that everything revolves around the earth. What’s the inversion?
I feel like no matter how you explain it, how correct and on point you explain it, Anthem will change his meaning so he can feel superior.
Huh?
Note to mods, this thing should be in MPSIMS