Well, they certainly should. The first job of a politician is to win. They can have the best policies in the world, but they are useless if they’re not in power.
No, they didn’t. The Senate, not the Republicans, declined to consider him due to his nomination being against their advice - advice the President at the time was constitutionally bound to follow, but instead ignored.
Obama shoudl have nominated whoever McConnell told him to. The legislature tell the President what to do, not the other way round.
This is a false assertion – there have been several pieces of evidence that support Ford’s accusation. But we’ve been over and over this – you don’t think those pieces of evidence count. Fine, I’m not interested in going on and on about it with you. The Republicans got their guy. We’ll see if the Democrats win either the House or Senate and actually do a full and thorough investigation, both of the sexual assault allegations and for perjury.
No, there haven’t. Not one. No-one remembers the party, and no-one remembers seeing Kavanaugh attack her. There is absolutely nothing, apart from her testimony, that suggests that anything like what she claims ever happened. You are trying to spin evidence that he drank, and evidence that he wrote disrespectful things about women, into corroboration of her claims. It is not. That, by the way, is not an opinion, it is an observable fact. Your bias (as so often) prevents you from seeing, and dealing with facts.
You DID imagine that I said anything about wanting “to return things to how they were”. I said nothing about that. I was merely pointing out Fiveyearlurker’s error.