Mrs. Diddy and I want to go to Italy for our next vacation, probably in the March area. We came across an offer that includes airfare to Rome, you stay there 3 days (okay, really two and a half), take a train to Venice, and then fly home from there two and a half days later.
So my question is, are we better off visiting one city at a time, i.e. Rome for 6 days and Venice some other time? 3 days seems swift for a city like that, but on the other hand I can’t imagine going all the way to Italy and only visiting one city.
I’m not too concerned about Venice; it seems a little more compact and easier to cover in 2 days. I’m just curious about Rome.