Some time ago my sister had what was thought to be a bite from a brown recluse spider or one of its grumpy relatives. She had a nasty rotten necrotic patch on her leg. At some point a doctor took a tissue sample and sent it to a lab, which was able to determine that it was in fact an arthropod bite (as opposed to some sort of bacterial infection.)
Possibly a culture and using reagents to react with the sample.
I have a PhD chemist friend who runs a hospital lab. The machine uses a few DROPS of body fluid and runs numerous test. Some sort of micro chemistry system. When done it prints and spits out a complete report. I think he my be overpaid as the machine does all the work. :rolleyes:
According to my emedicine link above, a tissue biopsy would have shown histologic findings including eosinophils in association with fibrinoid necrosis of the dermal and subcutaneous arteriolar walls, a dense band of neutrophils, panniculitis, occlusive phlebitis, and vascular thrombosis.
I’m not sure what about that sort of finding makes it consistant with an arthropod bite. We’ll have to wait until our SDMB pathologist pops in. Jackmannii?
It’s quite possible that someone (myself included) misunderstood or mistated something along the chain of communication from doctor to you all. I asked her if she knew any more details but she said she doesn’t.