Didn’t whitehouse.com used to be a porn site? Hmm. I wonder when they changed formats.
I’m not an Obama supporter, but this seems so ridiculous I’m amazed that this is a concern among his supporters. I’d be more concerned about Rezko and Exelon than the rantings of some nutjob.
It’s only a matter of time until we hear about the gay tryst McCain had on a Navy ship, or Hillary’s secret abortion of her Black baby, or Huckabee’s affair with a Klanswoman…
This is how malicious rumors get started. Hillary’s baby wasn’t aborted. For those who don’t know, the child was born of her assignation with the Calypso singer her parents hired for her 13th birthday, was given up in a private adoption, and inherited the ambitions of both parents when he grew up.
[QUOTE=E. Thorp]
And it won’t be a nutjob – it’ll be former colleagues or something. It isn’t too hard to round up a few conservative academics at Harvard or Chicago, is it? (Former fellow law students at the Harvard Law Review?)
QUOTE]
Conservatives at Harvard?? Are you kidding?
[QUOTE=PharmBoy]
Dubya went to Harvard.
Get a voice actor to record a “candid” tape of Barry Obama saying, “this is good crack,” etc.
I always figured that’s how they made that weird tape of “Martin Luther King” supposedly wanting to suck some guy off.
You don’t seem to understand that politics is the continuation of war by non-violent means, that the GOP are at war with, well, the rest of us, & they will use everything they can. This will come out, it will be used. You’re not going to shut them up, you’re not going to stop it. Confront it, deny it, prove it wrong, make it old news.
Considering the South freaked out & preemptively seceded when Lincoln was elected, & the country went through a bloody civil war, that’s probably not the antecedent you want it to be. :rolleyes:
I see what you mean, Dio. Dammed if you do dammed if you don’t. FWLIW my work’s done here.
See ya in some other thread.
Yeah, but the South reconsidered a few years later and came around, but to let the North save pride we “threw the game” at Appomattox.
Yes, you’re far too pessimistic.
If anything, evidence is now surfacing that Obama EXAGGERATED the drug use he’s already confessed to! Friends who knew him as a teen back in Hawaii are skeptical that he EVER did much in the way of drugs, other than the occasional toke of weed (which was pretty much par for the coure back in the Seventies).
Yes, well, I can see certainly see the logic behind a Senator/presidential wanna-be lying about taking drugs. Now which smilie do I use, :rolleyes: or maybe :smack: What’s the world coming to when you can’t get your friends to back you up. Obama can always claim plausible deniability because his buddies were high at the time.
Don’t take my word for it, pal.
So what are we debating exactly? That Obama did/didn’t snort a little between tokes? That he wasn’t a true party animal because he was a light-weight? Throw me a bone here.
What do you need a bone for? I’m not attacking Obama, am I?
Diogenes, in his usual paranoid fashion, has convinced himself that Obama is going to be destroyed by some idiot who claims to have engaged in all kinds of illicit sex and drug use with Obama.
I’m saying that, in all likelihood, Obama has nothing to worry about, because he wasn’t NEARLY as big a wild man or doper as he made himself out to be. His sordid past doesn’t seem to amount to much more than a few puffs on a joint now and then. And apart from yours truly, practically EVERY kid was doing that back in the Seventies.
It looks to me as if Barry Obama (as he was known then) was more a nerd than a stoner. I don’t see any huge scandal clouds on his horizon. Any reporter who pursues this story is going to get a lot of funny looks from Obama’s old friends and acquaintances, who all seem to agree that Barry was a pretty straight arrow.
On Tuesday February 26, 2006 Larry Craig will submit to a polygraph test in New York. The test, sponsored by Whitehouse.com will be conducted by a renowned expert and verified by a second renowned expert before being made public. There will be a video of the polygraph test .
Polygraphs are bullshit.
ETA thanks for the update, though. I just don’t think it would prove anything. I’m pretty sure I could pass a polygraph for my story about fucking John McCain up the ass.
Please do not hand straight lines to the Moderators.
What are straight lines?
Anyway, given the question in the title of this thread and the event taking place before the next big primaries, if Sinclair passes then that would most certainly magnify Sinclair’s credibility and the mainstream media would have to report it. If Sinclair passes, then i predict Obama is toast.