nm
Inspired by one suggestion I received on the Super Bowl Commercials thread I had just started, I decided that perhaps Googling for sites was the way to go.
And I found this, which may have been what I was thinking about.
I have some doubts about some of them, though. Sometimes it’s just how the “correction” is phrased.
I may as well express them here, instead of abandoning the thread to collective apathy, since now perhaps it may draw some responses.
Number 23: It would have been better to say that 3 primary colors don’t exist objectively, since the usefulness derives from our particular human biology. Unscientific, as was implied, is misleading.
Number 12: Didn’t we just have a thread on this one? Or a thread in which it came up as one example of arguably stupid phrases?
I mean, not that I could possibly care!!! 
Number 8: I hesitate to say anything, as I feel I’m going out on a limb. There definitely was a thread on this fairly recently, and the upshot was the consensus among the big brains here that the sun was really white, even through the atmosphere, and that the illusion was caused by the surrounding blue sky. This, reinforced by artwork, was the explanation of our non-existent yellow sun.
Against that, a recent astronomy magazine showed the precise, somewhat lumpy curve of frequency distribution. The article stated that the peak was in “yellow” but the combination balance made the sun’s apparent color yellow-white, even in space.
I was a bit “relieved” since I had been pretty sure that the total spectrum could not be even, leading to pure white, as it seems people here had concluded. Also, I had once had a non-conversation with a Syracuse U prof who insisted that the sun was “white” because all of the hues could be separated out.
I’m pretty sure that it was a recent Sky and Telescope, since the public library branch I recall reading it in does not carry Astronomy.