Canucks

Canucks

Johnny Canuck and Janney Canuck are Canadians from Sea to Sea in the country above the USA. We are proud to be called Canucks

We have special pride in ***Janney Canuck ** * which was the nome de plume of one of the famous Five, Emily Murphy. She and four others from the province of Alberta were responsible for “Woman Becoming Persons”, not only in Canada but ignited the fuse of Women’s Liberation that spread around the world.

The Famous Five are commemorated in our capital, Ottawa. When you visit our Parliament Buildings ensure you see the statues. Remember Johnny Canuck gave the USA Superman and basketball Janney Canuck and her Famous Five gave the woman of the world their status of Person.

http://www.collectionscanada.ca/05/0530_e.html

The “Persons” Case, 1927-1929
Famous in the annals of politics, the “Persons” Case allowed women to be appointed to the Senate of Canada. When Emily Murphy undertook the initiative, which would open the Senate to women, she and the four other women chosen by her - Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise McKinney, Irene Parlby and Nellie McLung - had been long-standing militants for social reform. For years, many individuals and associations had been calling for the appointment of women to the Senate. The Senate was very important to the women because, until the 1970s, it approved divorces, among other things. They believed that if women were to sit in the Senate, decisions concerning family matters would be more equitable.
On August 27, 1927, Emily Murphy and her companions decided to petition the government, asking the Supreme Court to examine the meaning of the word “persons” in Section 24 of the British North America Act to determine whether it included female persons. The Court took the question under consideration on March 14, 1928. Six weeks later, it replied in the negative. One of the Supreme Court’s arguments held that the Act should be interpreted in light of the times in which it was written. Since women were not politically active in 1867, they could not be elected.
The five Alberta women did not accept this decision, appealing to the Judicial Committee of England’s Privy Council, the highest Court of Appeal for Canada at that time. On October 18, 1929, the five Lords of the Judicial Committee came to the unanimous conclusion that “the word ‘persons’ in Section 24 includes both the male and female sex.…” According to them, the exclusion of women from public office was “a relic of days more barbarous than ours.”


Introduction | The “Persons” Case, 1927-1929 | Correspondence and Official Documents
The Impact of the Case | Suggested Readings | Contact Us





Our Janney Canucks do Canada proud then and now.

The link to the original column is What’s the origin of “Canuck”?

Was there a question?

Canucks

Johnny Canuck and Janney Canuck are Canadians from Sea to Sea in the country above the USA. We are proud to be called Canucks

We have special pride in Janney Canuck which was the Nome de plume of one of the famous Five, Emily Murphy. She and four others from the province of Alberta were responsible for “Woman Becoming Persons”, not only in Canada but ignited the fuse of Women’s Liberation that spread around the world.

The Famous Five are commemorated in our capital, Ottawa. When you visit our Parliament Buildings ensure you see the statues. Remember Johnny Canuck gave the USA Superman and basketball. Janney Canuck and her Famous Five gave the woman of the world their status of Person.

http://www.collectionscanada.ca/05/0530_e.html

Français | Help

Home > Browse Selected Topics > The Famous Five

Important Notices

The “Persons” Case, 1927-1929

Famous in the annals of politics, the “Persons” Case allowed women to be appointed to the Senate of Canada. When Emily Murphy undertook the initiative, which would open the Senate to women, she and the four other women chosen by her - Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise McKinney, Irene Parlby and Nellie McLung - had been long-standing militants for social reform. For years, many individuals and associations had been calling for the appointment of women to the Senate. The Senate was very important to the women because, until the 1970s, it approved divorces, among other things. They believed that if women were to sit in the Senate, decisions concerning family matters would be more equitable.

On August 27, 1927, Emily Murphy and her companions decided to petition the government, asking the Supreme Court to examine the meaning of the word “persons” in Section 24 of the British North America Act to determine whether it included female persons. The Court took the question under consideration on March 14, 1928. Six weeks later, it replied in the negative. One of the Supreme Court’s arguments held that the Act should be interpreted in light of the times in which it was written. Since women were not politically active in 1867, they could not be elected.

The five Alberta women did not accept this decision, appealing to the Judicial Committee of England’s Privy Council, the highest Court of Appeal for Canada at that time. On October 18, 1929, the five Lords of the Judicial Committee came to the unanimous conclusion that “the word ‘persons’ in Section 24 includes both the male and female sex.…” According to them, the exclusion of women from public office was “a relic of days more barbarous than ours.”


Introduction | The “Persons” Case, 1927-1929 | Correspondence and Official Documents
The Impact of the Case | Suggested Readings | Contact Us





Our Janney Canucks do Canada proud then and now.

Jack C. Downey CD
sgtmaj@telus.net
403 252 8426
http://www.canadianculture.com/geezer/jackstories.html

Galloping Geezer, this seems to be copying a website, which is against our rules… plus you double-posted.

I have deleted one of the double-posts, and closed this thread… since your comments have nothing to do with the Staff Report. And this is an Official Warning that we do not permit copying websites. This feels very much like spamming.