If one wants to find garbage, one has to go to a landfill. So, fair warning, some of these sites are offensive and evil. I don’t endorse them. I don’t endorse the views in them. Nevertheless they exist.
http://www.texemarrs.com/092011/david_duke_special_report.htm
If one believes the image being put out by the controlled media and by such Zionist propaganda organs as the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and others, the only answer possible is, “No, indeed.”
But the wise and the prudent learned many years ago not to trust the swill that the media elite and the “Israel First” Zionist groups serve to the masses. So, in the case of David Duke, I sallied forth to investigate for myself who this man is—what he teaches, what he believes, his life and background, and his character. May I please share my findings, dear friend, about David Duke with you?
libertarian, libertarianism, nationalism, nationalist, freedom, democracy, republicanism, corporatism, globalism, Zionism, Communism, Marxism
http://www.uss-liberty.com/2010/04/09/to-be-a-pro-israel-american-a-israel-first-american-a-zionist-american-is-essentially-and-honestly-anti-american-lets-stop-kidding-ourselves/
t amazes me when the Christians in America cannot correctly identify who is behind the push to have the word “Christ” removed from one of our most sacred holidays. It is not Christians; it is not devout, truly religious Jews - it is the Zionist Jews who 100% behind the defiling of our religious beliefs and holidays.
Defiling is a key word for Zionism loves to defile, taint and contaminate everything it touches, especially young non-Jew males and females. . .
The bottom line is and always has been that Israel-first Zionist Jews rape and pillage America at every possible opportunity…with the full cooperation of the Congress and the Presidency.
Israeli lobbyists and their Jewish-American neocon comrades in the Department of Defense use their leverage over the media, Congress, and their Zio-Christian collaborators to push America into an Iraqi war primarily for the benefit of the Jewish state. The neocon/Zionist engineered invasion of Iraq has alienated many of America’s historical allies, has weakened our military, has diminished our status throughout the world, has destroyed America’s moral and Christian vision, and has added substantially to our deficits and financial instability. Now these Israel-First traitors are pushing the Israeli/Zionist demand for an invasion of Iran and Syria.
Since the days of WWI, powerful forces within the United States and Europe have created war as an instrument for social change. The people could be convinced into accepting all sorts of bad things in the name of “self-defense.” Wall St. financiers first bankrolled the Bolsheviks of Russia, repeating the same successful formula a few years later by funding the National Socialists of Germany. The “Islamist militants” are merely the latest model of America’s perennial pre-fabricated enemy. The “Islamist” psyop serves the interests of the Zionist world financiers today and no one else.
Mikvner’s affirmation reflects both Obama’s one-sided and longstanding commitment to the State of Israel and loyalty to the Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC) in the United States, as well as the long-term and successful effort of a network of financially and politically powerful Jewish Zionists to ‘embed’ Obama to their ‘Israel First’ political apparatus. . . .
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, President Obama and Defense Secretary Gates are so deeply ‘embedded’ in the Zionist network and so deeply infused with the Israel-First ideology that ZPC ‘pressure’ will not be necessary. The three are, in effect, Zionized Zombies, eager to fawn and truckle, even to grotesque excesses, at every wink and gesture, signaling military handouts, UN vetoes and repeated provocative acts of war against Iran. They have even exceeded President Bush in their eagerness to please their Zionist mentors by recognizing Jerusalem as the ‘undivided’ capital of the Jews – effectively denying the rights of the Palestinian residents.
http://www.u-r-next.com/JewPedophile.htm
“RINO (RepublicanInNameOnly) NEWT”
Once Obama’s GOP opponent is chosen, THE NEWS JEWS will attack him like hungry vultures; then, the loan department doors will open at THE TOO BIG TO FAIL money-glutted Jew-controlled banks, low interest business and personal loans will EXPLODE – as will the stock and job markets – and any hope of a 2012 GOP presidential victory will IMPLODE. When Obama wins, the doors will slam shut!
Yeoman’s service, but treis isn’t interested in the facts. Something like 25 posts before he ever-so-honestly asked for a rundown of the history of “Israel Firster”, Lefty, of all people, pointed out that it’s been used by David Duke. Of course, if treis has a tiny bit of any honest interest in the phrase, he could’ve googled it and found a wealth of filth. Funny, then, that he instead decided to create a fetch quest instead…
Of course, the semantic content is obvious, and apologists play this little game with each revision. Which is why, naturally, “dual loyalty” is totally and completely different from “conflict of interest” because, ya know, because. And why accusing people of being “Israel-Firsters” doesn’t mean that it’s an accusation that our government is in thrall to the Jewish State and is in fact a Zionist Occupied Government because hey look over there!
Be fair to Treis.
He’s made it clear he thinks Stephen Walt, John Mearscheimer and Juan Coleare anti-Semites and he’s disgusted with all the people who aren’t.
Granted, he also insists that David Irving isn’t anti-Semitic.
I’m pretty convinced descriptivism is the only way to go, so take that as a starting point when addressing this essentially ethicolinguistic question.
If we’re trying to figure out whether anyone is reasonably offended, then I agree.