For the purposes of this thread, the “conventional” way of jump-starting a car is:
*connect positive cable to positive terminal of dead battery
*connect positive cable to positive terminal of good battery
*connect negative cable to suitable ground point on dead car (away from battery)
*connect negative cable to suitable ground point on good car (away from battery)
Inspired by this thread:
It was noted that certain cars can be damaged by jumpstarting in the conventional way. Can someone explain how this damage could happen, and why it’s prevented by connecting to “special” jump-start connection points?
Being a machine elf, you probably already know this: the battery is hooked up as you described to prevent a spark from igniting whatever batt fumes are hovering around, sparing you an acid bath when/if the sucker explodes.
I assume everyone in the known universe knows this (if I know it, everybody does). There is no condescension implied.
Now what you need to watch for are those tire pumps that plug into your “cigarette lighter.” The one I have blows 20 amp fuses if it’s plugged into the wrong one.
I was always taught that negative on the dead car was last and that you can connect to the neg terminal on the good battery because a) there is no spark risk since the circuit is not complete and b) discharged batteries give off hydrogen gas which is the explosion risk.
We had an Audi years ago that had jump starting terminals under the hood, but the battery was actually under the back seat.
My Bimmers never had this warning, but I’m guessing that there must be some voltage regulation or current limiting on these connections. Given that the highest voltage you can get off the donor car’s alternator is about 15V which is the same as your own car, I’m not sure how it could actually cause damage.
Yeah, you don’t have to connect to the frame on the dead car, as long as you connect the negative on the good car to the frame and you do that one last.
Hydrogen gas is one danger, but another danger is that if you accidentally reverse the cables, you can draw too much current which can potentially overheat either battery and cause its electrolyte to boil, resulting in the battery exploding. It’s a good idea to keep your face away from the battery in either case.
As for damaging your car, I don’t see that happening as long as you connect the cables correctly. But that is where the danger is. If you accidentally reverse the cables, you can fry the ECU, radio, traction control system, all sorts of stuff.
The only way I know to damage a car if you jump it “correctly” is that if you are jumping an antique car that runs off of 6 volts. Jumping it with 12 volts can damage all of the electrical components since they aren’t designed for that voltage.
In my case, it was a 2000-era BMW. I had a dead battery and jump started it using the regular way of positive to battery, negative to body. It started up, but the transmission stayed in safe mode. I was thinking it was related to the dead battery and looked around on the web for solutions. I found mention of other people having the same problem after a jump and people saying that the computer likely got fried from jumping from the battery rather than posts under the hood. I replaced the transmission control module and everything was fine.
Here’s a video where a guy mentions the reason at this 2:19 timestamp:
If the battery is dead or very depleted, I believe the “jumped” car and the donor car can be damaged.
Anecdotal, but here is a first hand-experience:
Around 20 years ago I was having lunch with my buddy at a restaurant. When we went to leave, his car wouldn’t start. His battery was obviously dead. I gave him a jump. Three days later my alternator failed. Coincidence? Maybe. But here’s my hypothesis: 1) an alternator is not designed to be connected to a dead battery, and 2) an alternator is not designed to charge a dead battery. I was the donor car, and I think #1 happened to me; my alternator was connected to a dead battery, which puts a large amount of stress on the rectifier diodes. if this is a valid assumption, then it’s also true that the diodes in an alternator can be damaged if it tries to completely charge a dead battery.
Except for the fact that jump starting a car has been manufacturer approved probably since shortly after the alternator was invented. I’ve been driving for 40 odd years and the vehicle manual always details the procedure. If the alternator could be damaged by this and the manufacturer’s warranty is liable, they would fix it.
I would imagine due to inductance issues when he circuit is first completed. Kind of like why an old lightbulb will tend to blow when you first turn it on.
ETA: does using a jump box avoid frying your electronics.
My 2002 Volkswagen’s manual specifically said not to use it to jumpstart other cars. The car was allowed to be jumpstarted, though. I don’t think it had any special instructions to do that, beyond the typical mentioned in the OP.
My BMW motorcycle had attachment points for jump starting it. The positive was (I think) on the transmission, near the foot peg, and the negative was on one of the cylinders. I always assumed that was because getting to the battery required removing the fuel tank, so it would have been impossible to jump start without the remote terminals.
That guy may well be correct about the appropriate way to jumpstart a BMW but his explanations of why make little sense. There’s just a bunch of strenuous assertions of technobabble.
And I found this post on another forum by someone who sounds plausible:
If this guy is right there are two reasons for using the specific jump points. Convenience, and to avoid the risk you connect through an emergency disconnect assembly.
Yet no one says you can’t replace a battery. And replacing the battery involves connecting a new battery to a dead system, which is little different to connecting an outside battery to a dead system. They only difference is that there may be an inrush from the outside battery to the car’s battery but why would that create a voltage spike?
There is a hellava lot of BS floating around about this subject. I’d like to see a technical justification or explanation of the supposed dangers in terms that someone who knows a little about electronics can evaluate. Because what I see is a bunch of half assed shibboleths.
I’m not saying the shibboleths are necessarily wrong (or don’t have at least have a grain of truth) but I’ve seen so many justifications that either clearly make no sense or are - at the least - too vague to be evaluated, to be sure.
I have jump started many cars over the years with very few problems. I have even jumped cars that had no battery at all by hooking up to the battery cables. Once the alternator Is running the car will run just fine without the battery as long as the voltage regulater is working properly. I did have a bit of trouble with cars made in the early 1980s around the time they switched from a mechanical regulater (in a metal box under the hood) to a solid state version (built in to the alternator). We had to replace two alternators before we found the problem and it was corrected in later models. When using an older model car to jump the newer ones, the regulater could be overloaded and fail. The work around was to unplug the connector on the alternator, start the car and reconnect the system.