I wasn’t suggesting that keyless systems are unreliable, although I do maintain that they have all sorts of disadvantages, as mentioned in this thread (plus, I guess, one advantage that @WildaBeast mentioned that you never have to take your keys out of your pocket). I was referring to the much more elaborate sequence of automated events that @LSLGuy seems to like.
I tend to regard every fancy doodad on a car as another opportunity for something to break, so it’s both an acquisition expense and a potential maintenance expense as well as the usual headache incurred in taking any car in for repairs. I may sound like a cranky old fogey, but fancy doodads and elaborate engineering are the principal reasons that high-end cars like Mercedes and BMW are expensive to maintain and unforgiving with respect to maintenance requirements.
Obviously not everyone agrees that these are major issues, but reliability is my absolute top #1 requirement in a car. As long as the vehicle is safe and solid, I care about almost nothing else besides reliability. Most shops other than dealerships have phased out loaners and courtesy shuttles, and if you don’t have a friend or someone nearby to give you a lift, the cost and hassle of a rental is pretty much the only option.
This also fits with my usual goal of keeping cars as long as possible. If a car is going to be reliable in its old age, it pretty much has to be intrinsically reliable to begin with. As a general rule of thumb, reliability tends to be correlated with simplicity. It’s certainly possible to have complex systems that are also very reliable – e.g.- aircraft and spacecraft – but the tradeoff there is that they’re extraordinarily expensive.