Last Wednesday, I got to call 911 when my dad started showing abrupt signs of a possible stroke. He was taken by ambulance to the nearest ER, where they assessed him, took an EKG, sent him for a CAT scan, did some blood work, and finally admitted him for observation.
He ended up having a trans-ischemic attack (that is, the clot hit, did damage, and then went away) and is home, recuperating.
There was something, though, during his time in the ER that really bothered me, especially because it didn’t make sense to me.
He has a history of primary, malignant hypertension. He’s on five classes of hypertension medications. He has a pacemaker due to bradycardia from all the medications he takes. He has rampant atherosclerosis, a history of throwing clots from his carotid arteries to his brain, and on top of that, he has a 4.0 cm aortic abdominal aneurysm. That day, he missed his mid-day medications completely, as his onset of symptoms occurred just before he’d have taken them, and if you go to the ER for anything, you pretty much have to expect not to be given anything to eat or drink while you’re there.
His cardiologist has told us to keep his blood pressure below 150/70, which we mostly manage to do. If it goes above 180, we stop whatever we’re doing, stuff clonidine down his mouth and check him frequently. If it doesn’t come down in an hour, we’re off to the ER.
Yet, while he was there, his blood pressure started in the 190s and spiked all the way up to 225/105 - something I’d never seen.
I asked the nurse about it, saying Dad hadn’t gotten his expected meds and was under serious emotional stress. He referred me to the doctor. I asked the doctor, repeating the lack of 1 p.m. meds, the emotional stress, and oh, by the way, he likes to flip off clots when he’s this hypertensive. The doctor shrugged and said that if he were that way for months, they’d be unhappy, but a few hours weren’t going to hurt him, and anyways, they’re using a cardiac protocol.
Once my mom arrived, she asked, said exactly the same things I did and added in the bit about an aortic abdominal aneurysm. She got the same answer. They’re using a cardiac protocol, and his blood pressure being astronomically high was not a problem in the short term. It took her over an hour and finally using her Very Angry Nurse voice, saying “he is symptomatic, he has a headache, you will bring his blood pressure down now.”
He got shots, he got pills, and his blood pressure came down to something less likely to cause him to geyser blood into his abdominal cavity.
Still.
I realize, even as well read and knowledgeable a layperson as I am, that there are tons of things I don’t know about emergency medicine or treating a person with symptoms of an ischemic stroke. But, I’m at a complete loss.
What is this “cardiac protocol” both the doctor and the nurse referred to?
How is it possible that any cardiac protocol takes precedence in treating an elderly hypertensive man with neurological ischemic symptoms, an aortic abdominal aneurysm, and a past history of trans-ischemic attacks?
He has no history of heart attack, angina, or fibrillation. His one cardiac issue is the pacemaker installed because all the hypertension medications he takes brought his pulse down to less than 40 beats per minute, making it impossible for him to do much more than sit up. The pacemaker has been in place for over a year with no problems.
A google of “cardiac protocol” gives me nothing concrete. Neither the doctor nor the nurse explained exactly what the protocol was, what it was intended to do, or why they were applying it to my dad. It was a busy day at the ER, I know the staff often doesn’t have the time to explain every concept and detail, but this just didn’t make sense - not to me, and not to my mom, who is an RN with 40 years experience.
Help me out, guys.