The Roman Catholic Church contributed $2 million to oppose marriage equality initiatives in the last election, and with related organizations like the Knights of Columbus, were responsible for about 2/3 of the funding opposing marriage equality in four states where such initiatives were on the ballot, according tothis article in the Huffington Post.
So if you are Catholic, or a member of the Knights of Columbus, and you do not hate gay people, think hard when that collection plate is passed. The money in it is apparently not all going to the poor. And if you are gay, well, know your enemy.
Correct, if you are OK with funding the promotion of inequality and discrimination and do so openly then…fine, I guess.
Many, many Catholics (I suspect the majority) are not OK with it.
I’m no expert in charitable spending but I suspect there are sick and homeless people that could put that money to better use. Still, it gives us a clear view of what the church leadership priorities are.
Given that Catholic Charities USA, which is only one of a myriad of catholic charities has a budget of 4.67 billion dollars, I think we can safely say the priority is helping the poor and that preserving marriage is somewhere down the list.
In fairness, I’m much more likely to spend my time and money on gay rights causes than I am on feeding and clothing the homeless. Much as I despise the Church’s position on gay rights overall, I can’t really fault them for how they divide their charitable donations between enforcing their prejudices, and helping the genuinely destitute. They do way more good on the latter than I do, both in absolute dollars (obviously) and as a percentage of available charitable funds.
I know their position. It is at odds with the modern world and our collective move towards greater equality. Their stance will fail and they will have to get used to it. Meantime, equality is denied, discrimination is promoted.
you are actually saying both those things too though I suspect you find the former statement a little too distasteful. It is, however, a perfectly accurate description of the catholic leadership’s stance.
Certainly there are some institutions that profess to care for the poor that could do without one of their myriad palaces or priceless works of art and put their wealth to better use. Yet they don’t.
I did not mean to suggest that there was some sort of equivalence between Catholic charities and money spent to oppose marriage equality, only that anyone contributing to the Catholic Church must now consider that their contributions are in part used to fund messages to persuade people outside the church that marriage equality is wrong, or to put it bluntly, funding the propaganda of bigotry and hate against gay people. The amount spent on charity is irrelevant to this point … after all, Mussolini made the trains run on time.
The catholic church has been at odds with many advances in humanity. Particularly science, medicine (womens reproductive rights in particular) and education. It is no great surprise that they continue to discriminate against women and homosexuals.
The catholic leadership are on record as being against the equal status of same-sex marriage. By what criteria are you judging “anti-marriage equality” as wrong?
But last I heard the church has bulging coffers of cash that seem to remain firmly within the temples. The finery of the palaces and cathedrals is not diminished, the bishops and popes accommodations are not reduced to hovels. Money that could be in the hands of the deserving is not. Surely the church should be turning themselves inside out to understand whether liquidating their assets does more more for the needy than merely using said assets as side-shows.
I see no such thinking at work.
Rather handily the Church manages to keep their untold wealth and splendour and use your “admission fee” defence.
If their holy book is truly gospel for them, then how can a Bishop sleep at night surrounded by palace walls and half a dozen Goya’s? The hypocrisy must scream at them constantly.
Sure, and you are comfortable with that. We understand all this and the rather more understanding and humanitarian portion of humanity take a very different view.
Your OP states that people who give to the Catholic Church should not do so because some of it might go toward keeping the government from changing the definition of marriage. Even though 99.99% of what is collected does not do so and the amount spent on the poor and the destitute is several thousand times the amount spent on political advertising. I guess if a few million poor people have to suffer so a gay person can get “married” that is a small price to pay.