Japan. First half of 20th Century. OK, so that was mostly the actions of an officially Shinto State with a large Buddhist minority, Shinto being a syncretic religion combining animism with Confucianism and other philosophies – but that really has to do with the hijack about whether these evils would happen or not in the absence of Organized Christianity, rather than with the actual points of the OP.
As to the actual OP, first, I had been under the impression these things were not “news” in the sense that they had been revealed in most places they had happened, and after the fact. That we may not have heard of it in American media until recently may just reflect our solipsistic POV on events elsewhere. Second, yes indeedy, most of the reaction has been some embarrassed coughing and throat-clearing. I have learned to expect no more from any large corporate institution.
Third, and addressing specifically the question of whether or to what extent this is a RCC problem vs. an Australian or Irish problem: The orphanage-workhouse or “home for incorrigibles” where children live in indentured servitude WAS and IS a widespread phenomenon around the world and WAS the rule once in what we now call the “developed west”, regardless of religious affiliation (Surely when Dickens has Scrooge ask “Are there not prisons and workhouses?” he did not only mean Papist institutions). HOWEVER what we would have here, is a situation wherein in countries/societies that properly did away with these practices in the “civil” sphere earlier in the late-19th/early-20th centuries(*), allowed the churches to get away with it – sometimes, like Ireland or Spain or Quebec, because of the strong influence of the Church over civil life; others like the USA/Australia out of a misguided “hands-off, don’t-ask-don’t-tell” policy where the states cared more that the church was taking the burden off their hands than about HOW it was doing so. Specially due to the hierarchical politics of the organization, the entities carrying out this within the RCC specifically, could in turn get away with it longer than congregation-accountable denominations.
(*But some, not so early.) (BTW let’s not forget the frequent collaboration of churchES and States in running “Indian/Aboriginal Schools” where the point was to erase the kids’ native culture and assimilate them)
However, Ben, I doubt that you’ll find many more of these still extant in this form in the major Western nations. I, too have read the various reports, and over the past 30 years the preferred pattern has been of a quiet phase-out, as much because of the economics and logistics of keeping it up, as because of any moral or legal consideration. This, along with the pedopriest issue, are stains on the RCC for which atonement shall be heavy and long, and the various hierarchs trying to wave it off are just pathetic (unlike the Inquisition, they can’t claim it was the Middle Ages and we didn’t know better).
However, as Evil Captor mentioned, at this point in time in the USA and Europe (and elsewhere through such groups as AI and HRW) we have the tools to figure out if and where there’s need for further inquiry or for action, without going into Ben’s idea of an open-ended “FBI hunt” specifically against the RCC – which is where he just goes over-the-top. I’m not for declaring open season on ANY group, whether justified for the sake of “the children” or of “homeland security against terror”; specially if it involves just barging in to “hunt” for anything-that-may-come-up, even if there is no complaint or probable cause.