Have you read the whole website I brought up in my long post earlier?
There you will find that there are priests who can convince sisters that they can have sex because they are only bound to celibacv, not to marry; so they can still have sex – but not marriage.
However, a sister is not only under celibacy but also under chastity, her discipline comes from the vow or promise of chastity.
A secular priest as distinct from a priest in a religious order or congregation or society is under the discipline of celibacy; but the observance of this abstinence from marriage is almost the same as the observance of the vow of chastity in religious orders. So that any sex acts are sacrilegious, even though technically (correct me here, anyone better informed) they are not violations of the discipline of celibacy.
I have started a thread on ‘Fornicating priests, bishops not removing them’. I hope it’s still there; I have not checked iits presence this time I started the computer. Please proceed there for further discussion on sex violations of priests on women.
Nice try. I don’t give a rat’s ass about fornicating priests. You said the Church turned a blind eye to MARRIED priests. I called you on it. Now we’re hearing about fornicating priests. Interesting, but not what I disputed.
Now you’re a liar twice over. You lied about the Church turning a blind eye towards married priests, and now you’re lying about the issue being married priests at all.
I guess TJ555 has gotten all the informaton and opinions he’s sought for in the matter of Catholics and Anal Sex. The Thread has gone into family planning and contraception, and then into the painful issue of incontinent priests involved with women.
If readers want to know more about my stand on that topic, please proceed to Married Priests in 60 Minutes. I have there some tips for bishops and priests who would like the Vatican to lift the celibacy obligation.