Vid Diesel: I can’t call myself a fan of his work but I am aware of the “nerd” side of his personality and it’s always impressed me that he’s never felt the need to gloss over it. His interest in sci-fi and role playing is well known and, while I would say I wouldn’t go out of my way to see one his films, I like him regardless and wouldn’t pass up the opportunity to sit down and share a few beers with him.
Milla Jovovich: I confess that I’ve had a bit of a crush on Milla since I was a young teen and I’m glad to hear that she truly is a sweetheart in her real life. I can’t quite put my finger on it but she’s always interested me for some reason as an actress as I think she approaches all her roles with an uncommon earnestness. Always interesting to watch even in her lesser movies. (I didn’t care for Ultraviolet for example, but she was still entertaining and I’ll always give her the benefit of the doubt.)
Pro Wrestling personalities: As dropzone points out, even though wrestlers tend to meld their real personalities with their performances somewhat, you still have to be careful not to confuse the two. From what I know most people in the industry are far more normal than we commonly see, and respectful of history to boot. (For those who are interested I’d recommend first Mickey Rourke’s film “The Wrestler” as a decent treatment of the source material in a dramatic setting and then Barry Blaustein’s “Beyond the Mat” as the best behind the scenes documentary I’ve ever seen about the business.)
I think Vince McMahon gets something of a bad rap for a couple of reasons, mostly because he plays his character to near perfection on TV and he’s taken a lot of risks with his company that haven’t always panned out. Also, his livelihood, and that of his family, rests on the success of the WWE’s “brand” and he’ll always back the health of it over the health of business as a whole. Not always admirable, but understandable at least. On a related note his daughter Stephanie, who effectively runs and manages the WWE these days, I understand is in a similar place. She made her name on television as a vindictive, shrewish character but in real life most have said she’s one of the kindest most generous people you’ll ever meet.
Both Mick Foley and, as previously mentioned Jim Cornette, are intelligent, thoughtful people who both hold very hardline liberal views politically. Foley’s been a little more open about it, but for Cornette it can come as a surprise for some people.
Shawn Michaels is an interesting case as I’ve heard conflicting viewpoints about him. Back in the 90’s it seems generally agreed he was a selfish, manipulative person, but he claims to have went through a religious, life changing conversion at one point. Foley wrote in one of his books, (and he knew Shawn both in 95-96 when he first started working for the WWE and later in 2002 after Shawn returned to wrestling full time after a career threatening back injury), that Shawn seemed to truly turn over a new leaf, valuing professionalism and consistency far more than he had in the past. There was a DVD released some time ago detailing his career up to that point where Michaels was interviewed and he relayed a story about being so drugged out his mind on painkillers that he didn’t remember spending time with his children, (it was about having eaten an entire box of cookies with them, and he didn’t remember doing so, his wife had to remind him), that made him stop and re-examine his life. It sounds very convenient, but he would be far from the first person to be affected by a small, personal event so I’m tempted to give him the benefit of the doubt on that.