Censorship on Television

I was wondering what the laws on censorship for TV are. I remember a while back there was hype for South Park because they were going to say ‘shit’ on TV. I never watched it, but supposedly they said the word many, many times. I was watching WWF Tough Enough on MTV a few days ago (god knows why) and many vulgarities were said, including ‘fuck’, ‘shit’, etc. I was pretty suprised, because a)It is cable TV, and b) It wasn’t live. I have seen slip-ups before, when someone says something but it can’t be edited because it was live. But Tough Enough is on MTV, and this was definitely not live.

So, what is the deal on censorship and vulgarity for TV?

I don’t believe there’s an actual law against saying “naughty” words. The “sht" episode of South Park proves that. It won’t be long before "fck” is used on a network show. Most likely, a police drama.

“Fuck” is used very frequently on Australian free-to-air TV, particularly in those police drama type shows. IIRC, it needs to be in the post-9:30pm timeslot.

In the US, the over-the-air networks tend to avoid strong language or overt sex, so that they are “family friendly” – that is, the little kiddies can turn on the TV to an over-the-air network and the parents needn’t be too worried about what they will see or hear.

Cable stations, OTOH, have no such aversions. Watch an episode of THE SOPRANOS some time. The cable stations cover themselves with an announcement before the show starts that the program about to follow contains strong language, nudity, sexual situations, etc. … to warn unsuspecting parents that SIX FEET UNDER is not appropriate for five-year olds.

Dex, you need to mind your terminology. HBO is NOT a cable station, it’s a “premium” station. You have to pay extra on top of the basic cable bill to get it, and that’s why it’s less restrained than other channels.

Cable stations are pretty much the same as broadcast stations, except for the broadcasting part. :wink: TBS, TNT, MTV, CNN, etc. are cable stations.

I read an interesting article about this very subjetc a couple of years ago. One interesting point that was made was that broadcast networks, ie; NBC, ABC, CBS etc. will let the word fuck air long before they will let the word(s) Goddammit/Goddamn air.

Of course, if you tune in to nearly any football game these days and thanks to the field level mikes you will hear a good number of F & S bombs being dropped.

Here in New Zealand, we have unedited Sopranos etc. on free to air TV. There is a Broadcasting Standards Authority (I think that’s the name) that complaints can be made to if you think what was broadcast breached the guidelines. If your complaint is upheld the TV station can be fined.

TBS is a bad example of that, since it’s a superstation, like WGN. It’s a cable channel, but it’s also broadcast.

Not so.

Unless you consider “bitch,” “sonuvabitch,” “bastard,” “fart,” and “cunt” “family-friendly” words. (“Cunt” was recently featured on a recent reality TV show.) All of these and more are part of the network “family hour,” an anachronism, I might add, that no longer exists.

I think that the first use of “bitch” was in a MASH* episode. That’s been almost twenty years. Yet I still see “bitch” bleeped out on some network programs.

Each network has a “standards and practices” office which reviews programs for content. There are, besides, Federal Communications Commission regulations which are enforced in response to complaints from the public.

The FCC’s regulations ban obscenity, and set out guidlines for when “indecent” material can be broadcast. The term “indecent” is a rather vague one; it appears to cover large portions of the Bible, for instance.

As one person’s definition of obscene or offensive material will vary considerably from another’s–one person’s definition is even liable to vary from day-to-day–regulations by both the FCC and the networks have traditionally concentrated on specific words or images which are prohibited, at least at certain times of day, and under certain circumstances.

This allows broadcasters to know in advance what is expected of them, even if the rules seem arbitrary, inflexible and, at times, petty. Hence George Carlin’s famous routine about the seven words you can’t say on air. Recently Carlin has reported that the FCC has relaxed its view and one can now say “pissed off”, but only if it is not because you have been “pissed on”. I believe it was actor Michael O’Donahough who observed that you can show a vagina on TV, but only if a baby is coming out of it at the time.

Over the years the networks have weakened their standards considerably. I will leave it to others to argue out the specifics of when this has been a good thing and when it hasn’t.

The FCC has also revised its rules considerably; in 1980 third party candidate Dr. Barry Commoner was able to say on the radio that he thought the choice between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, and the way in which they were conducting their campaigns, was pretty much “bullshit”, but he was only able to do so because he was saying it in a paid political announcement.

Since then the FCC seems to have increasingly focused on the context in which language or images appear and the time of day in which they are broadcast. While this seems to be a good thing in principle, it makes it increasingly difficult to know what will be allowed, and when.

Comedian Buddy Hackett once observed on The Tonight Show that early in his career he was prohibited from telling a story on air about an actor he knew who had been able to make himself cry while in character while on stage. He did this by holding his hand to his face and surreptisiously yanking loose a cluster of hairs from his nostril. He was told that this anecdote was too vulgar for broadcasting. Nowadays, Hackett concluded, you could yank a winged monkey out of your butt on live TV and nobody gave a damn.

Some years ago a local public radio station in St. Louis rebroadcast an on-air Christmas party it had aired live a couple of years before. During the program an on-air personality described getting her husband into the holiday spirit by wrapping her lips around his penis and “singing” Christmas carols up the shaft. Another on-air personality, using a bad imitation of an Irish brogue, pretended to be a Catholic priest and advised her on the Church’s position. (He said it was only a mortal sin when you got to the “Fa la la la” part).

While his alleged witticism showed a certain quickness and agility of thought, it struck me that this unscripted exchange kind of went over the line, considering that the program was being aired as a holiday presentation in the middle of the afternoon, and had been on for nearly an hour without aything remotely risque being said before. What’s more, as already said, it was a rebroadcast of a show from two years before, meaning that there had been plenty of opportunity in advance to omit this particular passage.

Having never written to the FCC before–and having never felt the need to–I sent a letter describing what I had heard. Roughly a year later I received a letter from the FCC saying that they were unable to investigate or take action as they were only able to control “obscene” material.