Check out Newley’s smile in thesephotos, and his expression in the reflected image of this photo and I think there’s quite a bit of similarity between him and our mystery man.
I’m beginning to think that thanks to cococ173 and his friend (and Carol Burnett, to whom hundreds of us around teh interwebs may owe a great many thanks if it was indeed her who provided the correct answer) we may finally have the mystery solved.
No, I know that, I mean you started it by posting the picture for Stoid. Anyway, I didn’t communicate my dry tone very well–I was snarking on the “OMG THIS IS A HOAX!!!” posts. I certainly don’t expect you to post a personal email in public, and definitely not your friend’s (or Ms. Burnett’s) email address.
Well, in fairness, no. The other choice is: not to trust you. I mean c’mon, switch places for a moment: why should we believe your friend emailed Carol Burnett personally and got a response so quickly, apparently a one-word reply? Are they BFFs or something? Is Carol Burnett that responsive to general fans?
(It’s the one word reply that’s so disappointing! Geeze, I was hoping for at least a “Oh yes, that was the Photoplay/Emmys/HoaxMasters Roast '71, and Newley was the one cracking us up by singing “What Kind of Fool Am I?” in Cockney rhyming slang!” :D)
I’d love it to be Newley just to get a bleedin’ answer already! The only problem with Tony Newley is that IRL his hair during this time period (early '70s) was almost impossibly dark brown/black …and extremely thick and untamed, even in formal dress. Plus, he had sideburns.
It could very well be Newley having gone “the wet look” instead of blow-dried, although it doesn’t quite fit his style at the time.
I did find a version of him with “smaller” hair, from 1965 – and left-profile, can you believe it? (I’m beginning to think actors/actresses have a universal hatred of their left profiles.) But you want to know what rules him out to me? His ears. If I learned anything from a fascinating documentary based on proving whether or not Anna Anderson was Grand Duchess Anastasia, it’s that ears are practically fingerprints. Newley’s ear has a rounded top and fairly thin edges. MM’s is slightly pointed and more delineated edges, and also seems higher on his head than Newley’s (although that could just be the different angle).
So I won’t say I’m 100% a refusnik on this issue, I’m just not certain. I will say that Newley would have been a proportionate star for that group in 1970–he makes a good substitute who fits in with the B-class stars present, and he was featured in Photoplay. Although it’s a bit hard to imagine what he’d have won for that year–Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, for which he co-wrote the terrific score, wouldn’t be released until 1971. Remember the Photoplay awards were basically a popularity contest. I do see he made a couple of albums in 1969, so maybe there was a “Favorite Male Vocalist” category that year?
I agree, not Newley. (He was quite a short guy). I’m old too and some of the suggestions in this thread have clearly been made by people too young to have been familiar with the celebrities they’re putting forward. I’ve been flabbergasted by some of them! I don’t know who it is but if we ever find out it will be thanks to people like choie.
Perusing the Getty Images (definitely a great resource, guys!) I found a shot of Newley that’s almost precisely the same angle (although certainly not the same expression) as our MM. Here’s a comparison shot.
The photo is undated, but it’s definitely late '60s / early '70s (probably closer to the former than latter). Either way, note the hairline–which is true of every image of Newley post-1967 or so. I think he might have gotten plugs, because there’s a noticeable difference when comparing the 1950s/mid-'60s era of his marriage to Joan Collins (which, wow, I never knew about)–for example, here’s a pic from 1966–to his Doctor Doolittle era, where his hairline drops a good inch or so, practically simian (e.g. this pic from 1967, the Doolittle premiere.
As an aside, I remember my father starting to get plugs in the mid-1970s. It… didn’t last. He embraced the “high forehead” look with a little help from a comb-over. As I recall him saying at the time, the hairplug process was pretty painful.
OT, but thank gawd my husband has embraced the receding hairline. He has always had a high widow’s peak, so it’s not so obvious (think Chris Meloni as Elliot Stabler). DH also likes military haircuts after serving 8 years in the reserves (1 year in Iraq). There are several bald men on my mother’s side of the family; the younger ones have gone for the Shel Silverstein look, and the older ones for neat trims, and nice hats.
I hope my son isn’t one of the early onset Socratic rings, but if he is, I’ll get him started on his hat collection. Comb-overs are awful.
A long shot, but I wonder if the MM would be one of the awards show seat-fillers. Perhaps they were all being prepped for a group photo, and while the photographer was getting ready and setting up the shot, someone told one of the seat-fillers to sit in for a second until John Wayne or Johnny Carson or whoever came back from the men’s room or a cigarette break.
I’d be surprised if it was an intentional hoax. I think most hoaxsters want their “art” to been seen and discussed. And this seems a bit obscure for that. (I know we are all talking about it, but I don’t think we would be the presumed hoaxster’s audience.)
This would explain two things for me. First, that’s a front row seat. I’m not saying that James Brolin and Karen Valentine are A list celebrities now. But at the time they were big TV stars. Certainly they would rate a front row seat before someone we don’t know today.
And if Johnny Carson was in the seat, just to the right of the photo, our MM wouldn’t have been some obscure guy that 21,000 of us have looked at and can’t place (probably 21,000 views not individual but work with me here!) That would have arguably been the seat of honor. And as likely, Carol Burnett or Danny Thomas would be in that seat. And if the MM was John Wayne or some other huge A list guy, that would explain that as well. I’m not going to go all mind reader as some have done here, but it does appear that some in the pic are looking to the right and laughing. Perhaps they are looking at the seat-filler and saying “Congratulations of your big film hahaha” joking with the guy and his 15 minutes of fame.
Hard to imagine that we can’t figure this guy out, so I’m looking for another likely explanation.
I’d guess that Peter Mark Richman (and family probably) know if he was at that awards show with all of those stars. No way I believe bhe just can’t remember.
My resolution to stay away lasted about 4 hours. I’m pathetic.
But I LOVE this solution! So MM is just some Joe Schmuck put there as a fill-in while they lined up the shots. Given that he’s in a tux, he’s probably someone’s date or husband, not a techie person. After all, it doesn’t make sense, if this were a live pic from the JC Show, for JC not to be in the picture.
Unfortunately, the only way to verify this is to see a picture (time/date-stamped, of course) of Johnny Carson and/or John Wayne either smoking a ciggie or taking a leak at the time this picture was taken. That could be tough… but I know this group is up to that challenge!
It could be some nobody. There’s also no reason that this had to be taken during a show. It could have been shot before or after, and Johnny may not have been around. I still think it’s possible that it’s Patrick Wayne. If you search on his name it will turn up tons of John Wayne links, so having him misidentified in TV listings is not surprising. The only problem with that theory is that it only faintly resembles Patrick Wayne. That is of course the problem with all the other guesses, including Newley.
Award show seat fillers are used for televised shows so that people at home don’t see an empty seat when the crowd is shown because, lord knows, that would be a terrible terrible thing, but I digress. Unless the Photoplay awards were televised from the Tonight Show studio, (were they televised at all?) this explanation makes no sense.
Do you realize that you just forfeited any credibility you might have had, by using this old chestnut of an ad hominem attack?
Nevertheless, since I’ll be AFK for a couple of days, I’ll address a couple of additional whoppers:
No, as a matter of fact I didn’t say that. “Making a name” wasn’t the motivation I claimed for all fakery on the Internet; it was one of several. Read my post and you will discover your mistake.
You don’t seem to understand what “pay-wall” means. All readers of this thread can see those pages, simply by clicking the links offered; if the pages were behind a pay-wall, we would have to input our paid-registration information in order to see them.
You’ve missed the point. The issue was not Did These People Go To A Party. The issue was Did Photoplay Host A Ceremony To Give Out its Awards (the way AMPAS puts on the Oscars).
See above for the meaning of “paywall.” In re the New York Times: how many of us have seen that, again? It would be interesting to know.
Having–what, 20K page views?–is quite satisfying for some who post mischief to the Internet. It’s about sitting back and watching people put time and effort into dealing with whatever you’ve posted. So, yeah: we certainly are part of any presumed hoaxter’s audience–a very valued part.
The glaring problem is that there is no way that anyone would have anticipated this response. It’s insane. It’s a picture of a bunch of 70’s celebs on Johnny Carson. Yawn. Gee, who’s this guy? I dunno. Shrug. Next. That it didn’t go like that is amazing, and certainly in no way predictable.