First of all, I am not asking for medical advice for myself or anyone I know. This query is just out of curiousity after watching some TV commercials tonight.
A commercial on TV for Cialis, a medication for ED, says in their disclaimer that their products should not be used when taking other medications (nitrates) for chest pain. I have also seen in movies and TV storylines where someone will begin to have some chest pains, possibly angina, and take a pill for it. This is usually done as if taking a Tums to relieve heartburn - as if it is no big deal and the medication is the normal fix for the symptoms.
I always thought that if you were having truly uncomfortable chest pains, that wasn’t heartburn, that you should seek medical attention.
Why is it that some recurring chest pains (that do seem to be heart related) can be expected and simply treated on the spot with medication when they occur, but some chest pains may signal serious problems that need medical attention? What kind of recurring heart problems are simply treated this way? How does someone who has these pains know that they will be treated by their medication or if they are possibly having a heart attack? Doesn’t a recurring heart-related chest pain indicate that something more serious than taking a medication, at the onset of the pain, is required?
I realize I am probably being misled by what I have seen on TV, but it seems to me that taking a pill when having chest pains is something you should do before you call an ambulance. Or do some people handle their heart problems this way simply because they have no insurance or money for proper treatment, and so use the pills as a temporary and cheap fix?