PatrickM:
Before I try to answer your post, I should give you some information.
For reasons, which are embaressing to me personally, I was acting in an increasingly confrontational manner. This came to a head in 2 threads I started just after the posts just above your latest.
Reading my posts on this thread now makes me shake my head ruefully. I was being a jerk.
So, I am sorry if I annoyed you. I am resisting the urge to go around and apolegise(sick) to everyone. I have had people in situations similar to mine do this to me. So I know how this will only annoy everyone further.
I did not want to get into this argument for the reason that you stated. There are more important things to do. But I will try to explain my problems with racist mascots, briefly.
The Clown is a racist caraciture(sick). Portraying Natives only as warriors to be feared is a simplification. It demeans Natives because it portrays them as bloodthirsty savages. I assure you the opposite is true. European culture at the time of contact was much more savage than most American cultures.
The Clown adds to cultural missunderstanding(sick). Many people have the impression that White-Red clashes were the result of incompatable cultures. The agricultural lifestyle of the Europeans couldn’t share the same territories as the nomadic Americans. This is untrue for 2 reasons.
- The Natives were not nomadic.
They were agriculturists. The corn and squash served at Thanksgiving were domesticated by the Natives. This is the reason there are so many towns in the eastern woodlands area end in -field. Because when the Whites killed and drove off the settlers there, they appropriated the fields.
It was only then that these Native tribes became nomadic. To escape White depridations(sick).
- Native cultures were not static.
Natives absorbed ideas and technology from the Europeans and vice-versa. The 2 peoples could have adapted to become compateble(sick). And often they did, for short periods of time.
Until new immigrants came along and took the Natives possesions. I am not talking about just land. But also houses(even mansions), barns, mills, and shops. The newcomers saw no need to build new homes or businesses, since there was nothing to stop them from simply claiming them from the Red Man.
U of I is an educational organization. They should not be in the business of furthering these steriotypes(sick). While having U of I get a new mascot will not end the problem of anti-native racism and misunderstanding, at least they will no longer be contributing to it.
I hope I have given you, if not an answer, at least something to think about. Yeah, I know I said briefly. But I got on a rant.
Sorry, I seem to have a case of the sick-ups today. 
Hey, maybe I should post that in the vomit synonyms thread. 
BTW- What did you think of my SUNY mascot joke? I am quite proud of that 1.
-curtis