Christian Militias. Just what we need...

[kaylasdad99]

@FriarTed

On their BeastWatch page, they even have the humorous list of “Numbers of the Beast”.

http://www.hutaree.com/ezrafiles.htm

Yeah, they’ll need that sense of humor… IN PRISON!

They missed one:

669 – The Beast with two backs.

[outlierrn]

The charge of seditious conspiracy carries a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison; attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction carries a statutory maximum penalty of life in prison; teaching the use of explosives materials carriers a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison; and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence carries a mandatory minimum penalty of five years in prison.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20100329/pl_usnw/DC78082_1
Sooo, not exactly kid gloves. More like life.

[Diogenes_the_Cynic]

Why are they being given Constitutional rights?These are terrorists right? why should they receive a trial on US territory? Why do Christian terrorists get different treatment than Muslim terrorists?

[coffeecat]

@outlierrn

. . . attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction carries a statutory maximum penalty of life in prison; teaching the use of explosives materials carriers a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison . . .

Since when is a weapon of mass destruction a pipe bomb rather than CBRN? And teaching? Is Amazon.com going to be these Hutarees cellmates? Or an M.I.T. professor who uses these books for their class? I don’t think too many people are spending $135.20 so they can have something to read on the beach.

[MEBuckner]

What the hell is with the Colonial Christian Republic? Do they think Obama is a Cylon or something?

[Muffin]

@MEBuckner

What the hell is with the Colonial Christian Republic?

A place for Christian’s colons, as opposed to us heathen assholes.

[Boyo_Jim]

@Diogenes_the_Cynic

Why are they being given Constitutional rights?These are terrorists right? why should they receive a trial on US territory? Why do Christian terrorists get different treatment than Muslim terrorists?

Um, god said so? After all, Muslim terrorists get 72 virgins, so you gotta offer the Christians something.

[boytyperanma]

Where are the Republicans to explain how the Democrats handled this one so poorly? Staying out of it so not to offend their base of crazy right wing Christians? Votes are more important than principles huh.

[John_Mace]

@boytyperanma

Where are the Republicans to explain how the Democrats handled this one so poorly? Staying out of it so not to offend their base of crazy right wing Christians? Votes are more important than principles huh.

Uhm, stretch much?

These guys were going after local cops. I think the number of constituents who would support these guys is vanishingly small.

[Digital_Stimulus]

@coffeecat

And teaching? Is Amazon.com going to be these Hutarees cellmates? Or an M.I.T. professor who uses these books for their class?

That bugged me out as well, but the news report I saw said (badly paraphrased from memory) that the offense was “teaching explosives creation with the intent to cause harm”. I know that my paraphrasing leaves some other qualifiers out, also – for instance, I think there was a clause attached to “harm”, indicating non-military use.

[Diogenes_the_Cynic]

Not support them, no, but the Republicans don’t want to call attention to the existence of domestic, right wing Christian terrorists either. Reemmber how indignant they were when we were warned about the potential rise of homegrown, right wing terrorism? That was supposed to be an outrageous and ludicrous possibility. Terrorists are only supposed to be Muslim.

[John_Mace]

@Diogenes_the_Cynic

Not support them, no, but the Republicans don’t want to call attention to the existence of domestic, right wing Christian terrorists either. Reemmber how indignant they were when we were warned about the potential rise of homegrown, right wing terrorism? That was supposed to be an outrageous and ludicrous possibility. Terrorists are only supposed to be Muslim.

The “outrage” by Congresscritters, such as it was, reflected that report’s warning about disaffected (or something like that) ex-military types. It was a “don’t we all support the troops” thingy.

Like this.

“This document is absurd and offensive,” said Sen. DeMint. “It suggests that Secretary Napolitano believes our Navy SEALs could be an equal or greater threat than the pirates they took down. Does the President really agree that veterans and tea party soccer moms are terrorists-in-waiting?”

“Certainly, extremism of all varieties is a threat to the United States and her citizens throughout the world,” said Vitter. “But I don’t believe that this report contains any evidence that would justify singling out these particular groups of Americans as suspected terrorists. To suggest that returning soldiers or Second Amendment rights advocates are prone to joining extremist groups is insulting and highly inflammable…

[Diogenes_the_Cynic]

That was part of it, but they were outraged about the words “right wing” in general.

The report also didn’t say that veterans were a threat per se, it said that they could be targeted for recruitment by domestic terrorist groups, which is a whole different thing.

Anyway, my point is that the suggestion above was not the political right supports Christian terrorist groups, but that they don’t like to call attention to them because it detracts from their xenophobic, holy war narrative.

[John_Mace]

Maybe. But these guys are just soooooooo far out there, that I can’t see it being an issue. In the OP, I mentioned how it was reported that even the “normal” militia types (who are pretty far out there to begin with) didn’t want anything to do with these guys.

[Derleth]

@Diogenes_the_Cynic

Anyway, my point is that the suggestion above was not the political right supports Christian terrorist groups, but that they don’t like to call attention to them because it detracts from their xenophobic, holy war narrative.

Yep. The conservatives are, once again, demonstrating that they are the PC ones and they are the ones who get offended by reality.

[pravnik]

@coffeecat

Since when is a weapon of mass destruction a pipe bomb rather than CBRN? And teaching? Is Amazon.com going to be these Hutarees cellmates? Or an M.I.T. professor who uses these books for their class? I don’t think too many people are spending $135.20 so they can have something to read on the beach.

“Weapon of mass destruction” is defined much more broadly under the U.S. Code statutes on terrorism than the usual military use of the term. Under the U.S. Code Title 18 § 2332a:

(c) Definitions.— For purposes of this section—
(2) the term “weapon of mass destruction” means—
(A) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title;
(B) any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;
(C) any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector (as those terms are defined in section 178 of this title); or
(D) any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life; and
(3) the term “property” includes all real and personal property.

The definition of “destructive device” under section 921:

The term “destructive device” means—
(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas—
(i) bomb,
(ii) grenade,
(iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces,
(iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce,
(v) mine, or
(vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses;
(B) any type of weapon (other than a shotgun or a shotgun shell which the Attorney General finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes) by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and
(C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled.

As for as the teaching of the use of explosives charge, Digital Stimulus has it right - it must be intended to facilitate a Federal crime of violence.

(2) Prohibition.— It shall be unlawful for any person—
(A) to teach or demonstrate the making or use of an explosive, a destructive device, or a weapon of mass destruction, or to distribute by any means information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of an explosive, destructive device, or weapon of mass destruction, with the intent that the teaching, demonstration, or information be used for, or in furtherance of, an activity that constitutes a Federal crime of violence; or

(B) to teach or demonstrate to any person the making or use of an explosive, a destructive device, or a weapon of mass destruction, or to distribute to any person, by any means, information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of an explosive, destructive device, or weapon of mass destruction, knowing that such person intends to use the teaching, demonstration, or information for, or in furtherance of, an activity that constitutes a Federal crime of violence.

[SmartAleq]

Here’s a gigantic shockaroo–the anti-government terrorists all demand public defenders. Anybody wanna bet you can find at least one letter to the editor written by one of these guys complaining that the cops don’t respond fast enough to 911 calls? Cognitive dissonance, it’s a wonder their tiny heads don’t explode.

[Merijeek]

@SmartAleq

Here’s a gigantic shockaroo–the anti-government terrorists all demand public defenders. Anybody wanna bet you can find at least one letter to the editor written by one of these guys complaining that the cops don’t respond fast enough to 911 calls? Cognitive dissonance, it’s a wonder their tiny heads don’t explode.

My God! It’s gotten so far so fast - Obama has even socialized the legal system!

-Joe

[SmartAleq]

@Merijeek

My God! It’s gotten so far so fast - Obama has even socialized the legal system!

-Joe

snerk

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

@John_Mace

Uhm, stretch much?

These guys were going after local cops. I think the number of constituents who would support these guys is vanishingly small.

Are you really that confident in predicting what the right wing will and won’t support or get all in a tizzy about these days?

I certainly have lost the capacity to estimate the likelihood of the right to forsake reason, shame and accountability in their positions on any given topic, but especially those that involve religion and terrorism.