I agree with all but the last sentence. Christian Reconstructionism is more of a philosophy of how to govern than an organized movement. While it is widespread, it is not organized, and for the reasons I posted upthread, I do not think it ever will be. Successful religious movements are nearly always led by central charismatic figures whose egos do not allow room for the type of shared leadership that an effective movement needs. This is a philosophy embraced by many leaders of small groups (conservative pastors, e.g.) and a few leaders of large but loosely organized followers (Dr Dobson, e.g.).
Nothing will come of it. It will remain a minority view with vocal adherents pushing their agenda at local levels with only intermittent successess rarely effective in establishing long-term toe-holds.
Democracy.
The days of the Puritans are long gone and Islamic countries are teaching us nicely that religious zealots are not the folks to put in charge of a free people.