[QUOTE=Antinor01]
Some use Proverbs 20:1 “Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.”
Others use the various passages that condemn drunkenness.
The church I grew up in cited Romans 14:21 "It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to “to drink wine, nor anything whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.”
Their rationale was that it may not be wrong of itself to do those things, but you never know when someone else has a drinking problem (or whatever issue) and seeing you do it may cause them problems.
[/QUOTE]
The problem with a rationale based on specific verses in the Bible is that it has a lot more nice things to say about wine than bad things. A sampler:
Ecclesiastes 9:7: “Go, eat your food with gladness, and drink your wine with a joyful heart, for it is now that God favors what you do.”
Song of Songs 1:2: “Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth— for your love is more delightful than wine.”
Genesis 14:18: “Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God Most High…”
Isaiah 55:1: “Come, all you who are thirsty,
come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.”
The no-wine crowd, being reasonably familiar with Scripture, is somewhat aware of this problem, and has come up with assorted work-arounds. One is the claim that the Hebrew word that we translate as ‘wine’ meant both wine and unfermented grape juice, and that the passages saying bad things about wine pointed to the former, while the good passages about wine meant the latter.
That has problems in that some of the passages referring favorably to wine certainly seem to mention its intoxicating properties, e.g. the Song of Songs passage above.
Another (stronger, IMHO) argument is that the Bible isn’t the final word on moral wisdom: in the Bible, slavery is accepted, and so is consumption of alcohol; we (the argument goes) now realize that both are wrong.
There are problems in turn with that (naturally), but I think that starts to get beyond the scope of the thread.