Clarification about mod comment in 'Akward Erections' thread

When we reach the point where the word “glistening” is worthy of an,
er, uh, anticipatory preemptive strike then rational minds must conclude
that moderation criteria here is a train wreck, and is off the deep end,
and should be scrapped, and the Powers That Be should just start the
moderation SOP over from scratch.

“I wish I could be everywhere that people are doin’ art, so that I could keep the public from gettin’ aroused, or titillated, or otherwise confused by the counterculture.”

Sen. Howell Tankerbell (Dixiecrat-GA)

I think rational minds would not conclude this at all. I think several of you are overreacting very badly. And I think the moderation in this case was perfect.

Several of who? Besides the confusion related to the TapaTalk tangent and people suggesting more uniform ways of identifying official Mod Actions, I don’t see anybody faulting the moderation, much less “overreacting very badly.” (other than colonial)

OP?

Really? I think if you look closely you’ll see that none of my posts actually criticize the moderation.

The person whose comment was modded even agreed. Let’s talk about the mods not doing something about your silly carriage returns.

I dig it man :::snaps fingers::: yeah!

Now do Howl!

I have seen the best threads on my message board destroyed by madness.

I don’t recall anyone ‘respecting’ Cartman’s ‘authoritah’. Are you sure you’re posting at the board you intended?

I totally support the moderation re the word “glistening,” and if there is a list of these things being kept somewhere, I would like to petition to have the word “moist” added to it. Thank you.

Oh, no, not that craziness.

Even were Cartman himself a mod, I’d respect his authoritah.

Signed,
Butters