Yes; it seems to have been the offshoot of several threads by @Roger_That , looking for discussion on outside-the-box thinking on civil disobedience activities, and other activities, which could be more effective in protesting the Supreme Court’s repeal of the Roe v. Wade decision, and then him trying to understand what was and was not allowable within board rules, and why.
This was the first one:
While I share the frustration of all the people turning out to demonstrate against SCOTUS, the only effect that has on the white-supremacist minority is to please them and amuse them. What would be the most effective form of civil disobedience that might have some effect?
I’m asking you to think outside the box, but realistically too. It would almost necessarily have to be something that was difficult to organize and costly to those engaging in it. Maybe it’s very expensive too so there would n…
Further threads:
You just closed my “civil disobedience” thread re: SCOTUS , on the grounds that:
This is not a Great Debate, not sure where it would belong, but not here.
This is a call of action and we do not allow those without prior approval and as this is generic it will never get approval.
It appears the answers being looked for would violate assorted laws.
So this thread is closed and will remain closed.
I don’t get any of this. I’m looking for ideas or suggestions on how something could be implemen…
While the mods are discussing this topic amongst themselves, I thought I might ask some specific questions and give some specific examples of topics that are likely to fall under this rubric.
One example that occured to me today was if a poster who lives in Georgia (I don’t, and never will, and never have) decides to protest the new law against providing water to voters waiting on long lines to vote. He or she posts about his or her plans to pack a van full of hundreds of bottles of water, and …