One more time, blowero… what I said was " “Unions” per se don’t exist in Texas, for the most part. Google the term “open shop law” for more information. “Advocacy organizations” would be a better term, which is why I kept using it."
Apparently, you interpreted this as:
“Unions” per se don’t exist in Texas, for the most part. Google the term “open shop law” for more information. “Advocacy organizations” would be a better term, which is why I kept using it."
Or perhaps:
Unions per se don’t exist in Texas, for the most part. Google the term “open shop law” for more information. “Advocacy organizations” would be a better term, which is why I kept using it.
…and from there, you apparently decided that what I said was
UNIONS DON’T EXIST IN TEXAS
…which was not what I said, nor what I meant. Large print, short, easily understood statement. Let’s see if that sinks in.
I used the term “advocacy groups” because it more accurately reflects what they actually do. It seems to me very different from unions as I have understood them and dealt with them in other states. There are no meetings to speak of (although conventions do happen), dues are handled very differently, there is no on-site ombudsman, and a great many other differences I could point out from my previous experiences with unions, most notably the fact that there are a great MANY of these groups, and membership tends to flow pretty freely, as teachers get bent with one, and move to another. There are substantial differences and I’ve said as much. More than once, now, I might add.
Now, if you insist on wildly misinterpreting my statements, and insisting that they are quotes… well… go ahead. It’s not like I can stop you. However, I should point out that *I’m not the one who winds up looking foolish * when it turns out that what you thought was a quote …wasn’t.
No doubt, though, this will be offset by your generous and unsubtle use of profanity. Hey, works for me. Not that I particularly care what you think, but I’d hate to have anyone else reading this thread think that you were quoting me, as opposed to quoting whatever sideways interpretation is spinning around between your ears.
You are NOT quoting me. Kindly do not speak for me, sir. Particularly if, as you have said earlier, you do not understand what I’m talking about.
Apparently, my attitude gets on your nerves. Wonder how you’d feel if I chose to violently dispute your word about circumstances associated with your job, in your state – circumstances I know nothing about? But, hey, far be it from me to interfere with your right to an opinion. I know what the situation is, as far as teachers’ unions in Texas, regardless of whether or not you believe it.
Just make sure you quote me accurately, if you’re going to insist that you know more about it than I do, okay? Otherwise, I will feel entitled, in future posts, to remark about how blowero said that we should force-feed all the gay people all the nuclear waste and send them to fight in Iraq, or something equally asinine.
Then again, no I won’t. That’s a cheap shot. I would be intentionally lying, as opposed to spreading false information out of misunderstanding, poisonous attitude, and apparent stubbornness, and I’m a better man than that.
I encourage you to be, also.