Oh fuck. He’s Willie Loman.
We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multidimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously. A machinic assemblage, through its diverse components, extracts its consistency by crossing ontological thresholds, non-linear thresholds of irreversibility, ontological and phylogenetic thresholds, creative thresholds of heterogenesis and autopoiesis. The notion of scale needs to be expanded to consider fractal symmetries in ontological terms.
I think that settles it.
autoberst says:
For a 12 to 18 year period, one may be legitimately occupied with any idea for use as a means to have lived constantly in human capacity, but how is it possible for judgments made by humans - under great sociocentric forces designed temporally to be foundations for the structure of intellectual considerations for all seasons - to be mundane?
Like the PC setting in front of us, we can concentrate on foundations for the structure of a painful activity that focuses attention on immediate need for our default position, however, somehow the individual must find a way to the logic of human communication on that which is mundane.
I think that such an approach, whereas in immediate need for the internal processes, must recognize that an individual must somehow foster excellent learned patterns and algorithms to have lived constantly on that which is our default position.
It appears that most people consider that the foundation for the structure of one internal function or process will express its anti-intellectualism by immediate need for judgments made by humans, whereas the counterpoint I suggest is that a range of intellectual skills and abilities for use as a means to perform the type of excellent judgments made by humans will be a painful activity.
We have never learned a range of intellectual skills and abilities designed temporally to be a foundation of intellectual judgments made by humans, so any idea that focuses attention on excellent internal processes, must also be studied as an individual idea that provides for a solid learned patterns and algorithms.
Frank, god bless you for issuing a warning for his latest.
I think he fails the Turing Test. Evidently some kind of bot, and not a very good one.
The thing I don’t get is why he posts his stuff to a message board — which is all about dialogue and interaction — versus just creating a blog in which his “students” can sit at his feet.
But he paid his subscription, and I really don’t see him hurting anyone. If the mods don’t care, he’s an easy one to ignore.
Ah… disregard my last post.
I’m, umm, honestly not sure how to respond to a Pit post that doesn’t include “Fuck you, Frank!” in it. 
OK, fuck you, Frank. Good call on closing that thread with a formal warning.
Fuck off and die, Frank. I hope you get gangrene in all of your limbs simultaneously. But thanks for closing that thread and warning coberst. I appreciate it!
By the way, I didn’t mean the death wish literally.
How about the gangrene, though? :dubious:
It is clear that it can be - and perhaps has been - said that one who performs the function of arbiter on our message boards and that one known to us all as, for the sake of argument *Frank *should perform the act of fornication with himself.
That’s all well and good, but when my body starts turning black and emitting a stupefying odor, I’ll come looking for you. Well, either that or take a shower.
Sometimes it’s hard to know just what to do about putrefaction.
I think you failed in simulating Coberst. That made more sense than he does.
He hasn’t posted in about a week. Dare we hope he’s gone in search of more receptive audiences?