The phone number isn’t tied to the address in any way. When someone gets their service disconnected, that number goes back into the pool and can be assigned to anyone else living within the same area code.
Plus, even if by some chance this woman the collection guy is looking for used to live in the apartment I do now, I’ve absolutely not the faintest clue where she lives now, nor any way to find out. The leasing office would never give out that information to a private citizen.
To top that off, it’s the collection agency’s job to find this person, not mine, and frankly, harassing me so I’ll do their job for them is a very poor way to go about it.
I do appreciate the responses so far, but what I would like to know is, are there specific legal penalties for a collection agency who harasses someone who just happens to have the former phone number of someone who owes them money? I want to know what, if anything, I can threaten them with if they keep bugging me.
I’ve looked up the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and it does address contacting third parties, but I’m not certain how this applies to me. Perhaps someone with more expertise can help me decipher the legalese here.
Section 805b says: “COMMUNICATION WITH THIRD PARTIES. Except as provided in section 804, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than a consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.”
Now, the relevant part of that Section 804 referred to says this: “Any debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information about the consumer shall… (3) not communicate with any such person more than once unless requested to do so by such person or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such person is erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location information.”
What defines “reasonably”? Section 813 lays out penalties for not complying with the Act, but can they just say, “Well, we were just SURE that she knew that gal but wasn’t saying”?