I think Sage Rat meant an omnibus thread for on-going discussion of articles there, tho. Like, if I want to talk about “Judicial Attire and how it relates to Justice”, I could post in this thread but when Sage Rat spots a new article about “Scale Economies of Justice”, he would just post in the same Lawfare discussion thread, not start a whole new thread. I might be wrong, but that is how I read his OP.
An omnibus comment thread wouldn’t really fit in debate. IMHO is better for that.
But we’ve had debate type series before, where some umbrella of topic creation exists and a thread is opened to debate/discuss/argue each. That’s totally fine.
How about I start it in GD and in the OP I’ll say that people should only bring up a new article if they have a point to debate? E.g.: Everyone’s aware of where the articles are and how to read them. There’s no value in linking over to the other site simply because a new article is up, you need to have some potentially controversial reason to introduce it as a new topic.
I don’t have any affiliation with their site, so unless people find us and start to post, I imagine that it would just be the normal subset of GD/Elections posters. Obviously, we can hope that we become the official unofficial commentary location.