The e-trade vomiting baby is hysterical. Shankasauruses.
I don’t like the one where the lady takes off her own head. Have no idea what they’re advertising but it’s disturbing.
The e-trade vomiting baby is hysterical. Shankasauruses.
I don’t like the one where the lady takes off her own head. Have no idea what they’re advertising but it’s disturbing.
There was a Superbowl ad with Jason Statham. It featured Statham doing action-y things in different decades, with him driving in cool luxury cars like Mercedes and BMW from each decade. At the end, he jumps to the '00s and into a completely forgettable car. I can’t even remember the brand. Maybe if I was in remotely in the market for luxury cars I’d have noted it, but it seems to me the perfect example of a failed ad. It ended up making it’s competitors look cooler!
There’s one playing right now that isn’t a failure by itself — in fact it’s a good ad. The problem is the frequency.
Two guys shoving off from a dock on a fishing trip. They coment on what a beautiful day it is. The guy on the dock says “too bad your boat will sink at 11:30”. Cut to a woman jogging in the park. She sees a dog and approaches it. The dog says “stay away from me. I have rabies”. Then the voiceover says “wouldn’t it be great of we knew when bad things were about to happen?” (or something like that). The ad is for diabetes education and how you should know your something-or-other score.
Lately, I’ve been watching more TV than I usually do, so perhaps this accounts for my reaction, but they seem to show this ad CONSTANTLY on all channels.
Almost to the point of irritation.
That amount of ad saturation has got to be extremely expensive. It makes me wonder every time I see it: Did the Diabetes Foundation just get a huge infusion of cash? They must have. Which triggers the next thought: Will they spend my donation (should I wish to make one) on even more ads?
She didn’t drink, she kissed him.
Saw this for the first time today and it’s freaking me out. I think it’s a Wal-Mart ad, for their garden department. There’s a mass of flowers slithering down the street followed by a couple slinking bags of fertilizer or topsoil or something. Flowers shouldn’t be creepy, but this writhing mass of daisies is downright squicky.
It’s kinda like maggots. One is kinda cute. Any more than one is oogy.
Fudgems - a coprophile had to involved in these ads at some point.
The Windows ads (can’t find a clip) where people are using this mystery OS and then REVEAL it’s Windows Vista. Response - “Gee Vista is supposed to really suck and this OS wasn’t too bad. What a surprise!”
Beyond pathetic.
Some migraine medication. That commercial drives me nuts not for the head-removal, but because the second woman who beheads herself (in the supermarket) has an absolutely hideous haircut. Makes her look like an especially frumpy poodle.
The other new Wal-Mart ad is for makeup. Not for any particular brand, just “buy your makeup at Wal-Mart.” And there is a woman singing “I Enjoy Being a Girl” from *Flower Drum Song *in the most whiny, nasal, aren’t-I-hip-and-edgy voice that makes me not only not want to make me buy my makeup from Wal-Mart, but makes me want to jam a tube of Maybelline mascara sideways down her epiglottis. :rolleyes:
I really liked this ad (called The Mojave Experiment) because it matched my experiences with people and Vista. People would ask me why I had a laptop with Vista on it because Vista sucked. Even though the reality is that Vista’s biggest problem (old software/hardware compatibility) didn’t apply to anyone doing the complaining. They were casual users that would have been upgrading PCs that were at least five years old. They weren’t upgrading anything or getting into the nuts and bolts of installation. They would be buying a new PC and taking it out of the box.
And Vista is a good OS for that. Which is what the ads showed.
There’s a cheque cashing franchise around these parts with an incredibly weak campaign.
Their ads repeatedly ask the question What kind of a person uses Money Mart?
The whole tone of the ads is, “It’s not really just for desperate losers with no other options. Honest!” …but they don’t really make much of an argument, and the spokesman that they’ve picked comes off as a slimy, smug, waste of skin that looks like a character actor doing a screentest for a bit part as a con-man on an episode of Law & Order.
“Who uses Money Mart? People who (although they are clearly living pay-to-pay) are happy to sacrifice 3% of their pay to have their cheque cashed. Stupid people, basically. Hey, you could be stupid.” [smarmy smile]
What kind of a bank holds your regular paycheque, anyway?
My wife and I don’t have a TV and we both hate Alec Baldwin (except for his small but powerful role in Glengarry Glen Ross, which is a topic for another day).
But we were over at a friend’s house watching the SuperBowl and saw the Hulu ad. And I have to admit that I laughed my ass off. The best line was something like, 'What…like you’re going to turn off your both your television AND your computing device?" And then he smirks and chuckles at the stupidity of such a suggestion.
I thought it was great. But I don’t get out much. Maybe that’s the reason.
They released an edited version of the commercial later in its run; the original clearly showed her placing her lips to his and chugging, complete with “glug glug” sound effects.
I’ve noticed that they’ve edited the beheading migraine commercials – now the ladies (why always ladies?) rip their heads of of a page. It doesn’t make any sense at all.