I live quite near the coast of Hampshire, but I’ve only driven up the coast of New Hampshire.
I’ve shopped in Portsmouth, Hampshire (and climbed around on the Victory) as it’s only a few miles up the M27, but never been to/stopped in Portsmouth, NH.
I work in Winchester, Hants, but never been to the one in NH.
It’s probably going to piss some people off, but New Hampshire always wins the informal “what is the least notable state?” debates I have had. It’s geographically small, but not small enough to be notable. A small population, but not small enough to be interesting. It’s new England, but not as New Englandy as some others. There is really no generally recognized crop, prepared food, or product associated with New Hampshire, nor industry. If you ask random people to come up with a motto for New Hampshire you usually get something along the lines of "New Hampshire:…umm…well… It’s a state.
It was a big reason why the British bothered to fight for the colonies. The tall straight pine trees from New Hampshire were perfect for ship masts and were not available anywhere in Britain. The Royal Navy needed a lot of ships masts. See: Pine Tree Riot
I was born in Portsmouth (UK) and spent my first 17 years in old Hampshire - despite some nice countryside I’d say it’s pretty bland too really. It’s probably okay if you can afford a large country pile - but then, where isn’t?
Really? In a competition with Delaware, Rhode Island, North and South Dakota and Oklahoma, you’d pick New Hampshire? At least New Hampshire has skiing and a mountain lots of people die on.
I always think of New Hampshire as the first state to host a primary for the presidential elections. I always assumed it was because they had nothing else going for them.