Complementary colours

I’ve just demonstrated my ignorance towards colour to a couple of friends of mine. So much for being the artist of the group.

I personally find colours that are opposite on the colour wheel are the least appropriate combinations there are. Red does NOT go well with green, blue is horrible with orange, purple looks sickly next to yellow.

But apparently this goes against standard colour theory, that in fact the complementary colours are meant to be the most well associated.

I say bollocks.

Am I just weird, then? Or is it, as I maintain, a case of that colour theory is all well and good as a theory, but in practice it just doesn’t really work?

If you’re a Gator fan, then Orange and Blue is simply Heaven…

:smiley:
::scamper, scamper::

AFAIK, complementary colours doesn’t mean the colours oppose each other on the color wheel. It means they will produce black when mxed together, if you are talking about pigments.

Nice complimentary colour diagram

It sort of proves my point that mixed together they make some ugly grey colour - but what I want to know is if other people think these so called ‘complentary’ colours don’t actually look good beside each other. Like if you had a foreground object that was red, would you put it in a ‘complementary’ green environment? Or would it make your eyes water?

Well, Guano, as a visually inclined person myself I would have to say that you’re incorrect…but with many qualifications.

I love complementary colors, but they’re only suitable when you want to create a high degree of contrast between elements in your image. I think red and green go wonderfully together and purple (actually, more of a midnight blue) and yellow are one of my favorite color combos.

But there are many many ways of grouping colors together. Complementary colors is one, for forceful, dynamic compositions. For more subtlety, you might one to deal with varying shades of one color, with only cool colors accented with a bit of warm colors, etc, etc, etc. As long as the colors are of the same type (e.g. pastels, earth tones, fluorescents) you’re generally okay. You obviously already know this if you’re an artist.

I wouldn’t say that complementary colors are “meant” to go together, but in generally composition based around complements are strong and dynamic.

Think red barn in a green field? For me, it looks great. Then again, I love the expressionists and their fairly unsubtle use of color. For your eye, this color palette may be too extreme. I just think it’s a matter of personal taste at this point.

My principle is this:

If you imagine a colour wheel, instead of choosing red, and the opposing green, take the yellow-green, or the blue-green that is on either side of it.

So your example of a red barn in green grass would work, because they aren’t pure opposites, they’re shaded slightly off-kilter. Pure red, and yellowy-field-green. (Plus sky-blue, which also helps)

I’m an artist who works with color all the time, and I absolutely detest pure complementary colors used together.

I recently had to design a Christmas cd, and had to use red and green. So I chose a cranberry red with a very deep forest green (almost black). The results are stunning!

pulykamell pretty much nailed it there, but I do have a few things to add:

When using complemetary colors, proportion is the key.

If you were painting on canvas and you wanted shadows in your painting, you would not add black to your basic hue - even a small amount of black would “distort” your color and look very unnatural. If you were to add a small amount of a complement, though, you’d “tone down” your basic hue, making a very natural looking shadow. If you mixed equal amounts of complements, the result would be a muddy, bland, non-color.

The human eye looks for contrast. If there’s contrast, the eye gets “excited” - a monochrome palette is soothing, but can easily get boring. If there’s too much contrast, the eye gets “seasick” for lack of a better word, and your brain compensates for this by mentally blending the colors into that muddy non-color.

Similarly, if we were talking about clothing, you could wear a bright blue shirt and select a tie with a bit of orange in it (and this does NOT have to be a pumpkin orange - you could go with a peachy-orange, a reddish-orange terracotta, a pale yellow-orange). If you were to wear that same bright blue shirt with a pair of bright orange pants, you’d look silly.

I teach color theory to my polymer clay students, but I’m much better at showing then telling, so if the above makes little sense, I can try again :slight_smile: Here’s a thing, though, I always tell my students about color: yes, it’s important to use color wisely if you’re going to do visual art, but people worry too much about the details sometimes. If you get dressed in the morning and people don’t point at your outfit and snicker, chances are good that you have a basic working knowledge of color theory.

One last thing - if you don’t think complementary colors can work well together, think about Christmas (red & green), Easter (purple & yellow) and football (blue & orange). Again, the proportions of these colors used together create visual excitement, and marketing people use this well!

Congratulations, because you’ve just redeemed yourself as the artist of the group. What you’ve described (especially if all three colors are used together) is called a split complementary, and is considered by many to be the most pleasing of color combinations. You may want to listen to the Color Harmony portion of this show.

As for direct opposites in colors, as the above post said, proportion is indeed the key. A 1:1 ratio of complementary colors is jarring, but a large field of one color with a spot of its complement can work very well.

Earthling! You a Bowie fan?? Sorry for hijack!

David Bowie? Uh, actually, no. (Not that I’m opposed to him in any way, mind you.) Did I somehow make a Bowie reference in my post without knowing it?

I did live with a Bowie fan in college, though, so maybe some of it rubbed off.

On more thing to expound on Life on Wry’s post. In regards to using the correct proportions, artists refer to something as “color weight” occassionally. This is how much “weight” a color carries, and is used to help determine how to make a balanced composition. For example, red and green basically weigh the same. With orange and blue, orange is “heavier” so you must use less of it to balance the composition. Maybe something along the lines of one part orange to three parts blue. With purple and yellow, yellow is very heavy, about 8 times the weight of purple.

These weights are basically made up by the contrast they generate within a picture. Purple and yellow are very contrasty in terms of brightness. Red and green not so much so.

And panache - that’s an excellent use of complementaries. Nobody has ever said you must use pure, super-saturated colors.
Just an extra two cents.