How about ‘possibly’?
So your response would be, “Me, and possibly Bob.”
How about ‘possibly’?
So your response would be, “Me, and possibly Bob.”
How about “intervening variables”?
If singular “they” is good enough for Shakespeare, it’s good enough for me.
In any case, my favourite find in this thread so far is “niblings,” for nieces and nephews. Someone asked about aunts and uncles; unfortunately “ancles” is already taken.
A word for “reading” a book when you actually listened to it on tape/cd. I feel totally awkward saying I read the fifth Harry Potter book when I actually listened to it on cd. Unfortunately, I listened to the fifth Harry Potter book is equally as bad.
Not in any prose that needs to get past me. Rewrite it any way you want (going plural often works), but rewrite it.
what do you call a “godchild” when neither of you is religious?
Audi-bibe! (Combination of audio and “biblio”)
Making up words is fun.
My personal suspicion is that the ranting and railing about singular “they” is pretty much the same as happened when singular “you” came in. Downfall of civilisation, not on my watch, etc. etc., and I bet most people don’t know that ‘you’ was originally a plural form anymore …
(I’m glad you like “niblings”.)
How do you get to be a godparent without at least one of you being religious? Isn’t it a religious office (in the case of a Christian, the sponsor at the baptism)?
Hey, I’m a pervert!
The right of the person who brings the food to nosh a little from the bag while driing home. You know, eat a couple french fries or whatever.
Actually I do have a proposed word for this: Nibblage.
That’s why I said “godchild” and not Godchild… My friend is of no religious affiliation, and I’ve given up all hope, so what do I call her child - who, had we all been of the appropriate Religion, would have been my Godchild?