I was wondering this when I had a conference call today when this happened: person A calls person B. Person A then conferences in person C. They talk for a while and then person A hangs up. Persons B & C can still talk to each other, even though they were talking to each other “through A”. Is there still a circuit through A even though he hung up? Is a seperate circuit established from B to C when A confrenced in C? If so, who pays for that? To confuse matters even further, C conferenced in another party D (while A was still on the line). If it matters, A was in Seattle, WA., B (me) was in Washington DC, C and D were in Peoria, IL.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is it normal for U-Verse VoIP not to hang up unless BOTH parties do? | 8 | 2055 | February 14, 2015 | |
| "Only person in this conference" call? | 2 | 12301 | July 30, 2016 | |
| Cell Phone party lines | 1 | 4586 | September 23, 2004 | |
| In the 70's could simultaneous incoming calls to a house "cancel each other out"? | 21 | 2771 | May 15, 2012 | |
| Strange phone question | 0 | 852 | May 23, 2015 |