Considering the source

[Early_Out]

*Originally posted by erislover *
**This is true. And it would be true whether you were a credible source or not, which I could find out by inspection of the threads in GD, not by simply checking with you. **

Well, you certainly wouldn’t want to accept me as a “reliable source.” Hell, my concept of reality is only a misdemeanor in some states.

[Mangetout]

*Originally posted by Ludovic *
**I miss Justhink **

Just for you, then:

AutoHink™ Says
Beginning from extraction of isolated sequences under a suppressed cognitive conceptual framework, we can siphon pressure in implied methods of the integrated death time-specific signature of logical conversion, thus activating communication of an irreversable symbol in the logical object by solving my energy of rudimentary supression. That much is simple, but activating production in an integrated cannibalisation of the observed sense more than translates many tools of structured oblivion, it is therefore easy to see that in order to construct implied transparency of a simulated resource incompletely extracts many slaves of irreversable method.

To sum up: activating production following a sentient symbol under distilled devices deludes all cognition of irreversable stages, we must activate location on structured resolution from associative thought-forms, transcending their death of abstracted supression