I was pretty startled today when someone pointed me in the direction of this blog post by a Nigerian resident of the U.K.
I was fairly interested in the perception of the story from the viewpoint of a Nigerian, but I got a little and :dubious: when I saw this:
Huh??
If the girls weren’t kidnapped and this is a hoax, then why would the perpetrators of the kidnapping claim to have committed the crime?
If the girls being kidnapped is a hoax, who is in the videos Boko Haram released?
The post decries conspiracy theories, yet shows classic examples of what I think of as conspiracy theorist thinking:
Maybe Boko Haram has better control over the hinterland than the police do? Maybe the report of a dead soldier is from when Boko Haram attacked and overcame the resistance of police? Maybe Boko Haram bribed the police? Maybe the police have been infiltrated by Boko Haram and the roadblocks were thus easily avoided? None of this seems like a justifiable way to leap to the conclusion that the kidnapping did not happen or was not perpetrated by Boko Haram.
Seems to me terrorists would be able to operate and move trucks around because they have heavy weapons. Since they’re the attackers, it seems likely they could put more people and heavier weapons into place than whoever may have been guarding the school, the guards have to just wait there for hundreds of days, not sure which day the terrorists might show up. (Apparently the Nigerian security forces had some advance warning of the attack, and were either unable, unwilling, or lacked the competence to respond appropriately.
While I don’t know the answer to the questions, unless someone comes forward to say the girls in the video released by Boko Haram aren’t the ones who were kidnapped, the questions seem moot.
Well, at least one of them was there and was killed by Boko Haram.
The rest of the post is pretty long, but I don’t really get from it what she thinks happened - whether the kidnapping was staged, a hoax, an actual event that occurred with the complicity of government officials, an actual event taken advantage of by unscrupulous people, or all of the above. But mostly it seems like classic CT “just asking questions” technique, making assumptions about what should have happened rather than working from reports of what actually might have happened.
Honestly, Ms. Ilesanmi seems like a pretty conspiracy-theory prone person, even as she decries others as being conspiracy theorists.
However, I’m not sure - she might know the situation in Nigeria better than I do, so I wanted to see what others think - how much suspicion of the story is justified given that the Nigerian government is corrupt and news services in Nigeria are not as reliable as those in North America or western Europe?