I didn’t see anything in the current replies that is new.
I did read the John Edwards take on Larry King. He did a commendable job, I did learn how he sees the spirit world which is a bit different than I. I think James Van Praagh is the best, he actually sees the “dead” people. I and John read on the energy and flashes of symbols we see. I am not a good reader, takes a lot of time and practice. No, what I said here doesn’t mean John is not a good reader.
Randi has repeatedly refused to accept third party testing, observation or anything else. The psychics have been calling him out for some time now, offering a million dollars and all kinds of incentives, to no avail. Now why would this be? The figures you are quoting are his figures, no independent varification, no nothing. This is not acceptable as a way to find truth.
I see some fishtailling on the “let’s do a cold reading” idea, I think it is beginning to become apparent how the unreliable this method really is.
Over all, on this thread, I think we have made clear skeptics have no right to call psychics names, because they have no proof of anything the psychics are doing wrong.
Oh, yes, readings are certainly not all questions. What psychics see are many spiritual entities standing close to the person being read. If the person wants to talk to Aunt Helen, the psychic will try to determine if Aunt Helen is there, or just go on trying to translate the messages he gets from the others. One of them may be showing a lamp, the psychic asks if the lamp means anything to the person being read and goes from there. Aunt Helen may or may not be in attendance. Psychics read what they see, they can’t read anything else. Sometimes psychics just make statements about what they see if they are sure it pertains to the person. Psychics interpret symbols, sometimes they interpret them wrong, it happens, but they still see them.
There is a popular practice game among psychics for learning the skill. No more than 10 people, preferablely less. Each person brings to the table a small object which is placed in a box.
This object is something the person knows the history, origin and other information  about. The putting in the box is done without the knowledge of the others.
The box is passed around and each person draws one, then in order each one tells what they feel about the item. The one who owns the item then tells the reader how close they came to the truth. There are techniques for clearing the mind and other methods, but overall it is a fun game.
I can still remember the first time I got a solid hit. I had drawn a quartz crystal from the box. Flashing through my mind was a picture on a bow and arrow laying on a cross. I interpreted it as an Indian graveyard, and behold the stone was found in an Indian graveyard. Psychics are honest with each other, and don’t hedge one way or the other. It is part of the training, you add nothing to what you see, that is the code.
Cold readings are skeptical BS.
Love
Leroy