You think you’re married to Morgan Fairchild. Does she have a restraining order against you?
Meanwhile, I’m sure that Bryan Ekers is very important to Bryan Ekers.
You think you’re married to Morgan Fairchild. Does she have a restraining order against you?
Meanwhile, I’m sure that Bryan Ekers is very important to Bryan Ekers.
Keep going.
(post shortened)
Hahahaha. Undercuts anything serious said in the BBQ pit. You’re a hoot.
I can tell doorhinge is winning the thread, because he’s explicitly laughing and using smilies to mock you guys.
Where’s your emoticonic punctuation, Czarcasm? And how about your onomatopoeic laughter, Bryan? Hmmm?
The problem with you bleeding heart liberals is you just don’t understand rhetoric.
Anything else?
Once more for a simple twist of fate
Harrumph, I say, HARRUMPH!
I’m thinking of using him as the poster child for a “Internet Tourette’s Syndrome” campaign.
A wise old owl lived in an oak.
The more he saw, the less he spoke.
The less he spoke, the more he heard.
Why can’t you be like that old bird?
Then you actually don’t know what reason is. You can disagree with my reasoning (as iiandyiiii does) without pretending it doesn’t exist, as so many others do, because presumably they dislike the conclusions but can’t show them to be invalid.
You HAVE no reasoning other than blind worship of authority and the need to fellate cops at every opportunity. You and Smapti think coward cops should shoot anybody who scares them, which apparently is all black people who are not already in jail for not bowing to the Will of the Cop sufficiently quickly.
Unhinged is merely a delusional whack job. You and Smapti are downright dangerous to Civilization.
Straw, meet man. Man, straw.
I can understand why polls are banned in the pit, but could we at least consider a show of hands system. Just so when someone like Doorhinge says “waddya mean, us”, the various people in stark disagreement can indicate who they are.
Think of it as a preemptive strike against “I’ve had loads of private messages supporting me”
Date of story is July 18, but date of incident was June 18.
DASHCAM: COPS KILL UNARMED MOM, BRAG ABOUT SHOOTING HER UNTIL ‘HER FACE EXPLODED’ (VIDEO)
Disturbed and likely impaired, but unarmed, white woman shot even though she was no immediate threat to anyone.
In the cops’ defense, there’s a fair bit of glare on her windshield. It would’ve been very hard to see inside her vehicle–she could have been black.
Seriously though, that as an ego-shooting–she did not obey so she was punished.
It was not about protecting anyone.
Not that it makes a difference to the thread or detracts from the horror of the shooting, but the incident actually happened June 18, 2010. It’s back in the news because it’s relevant to the resurgent public interest in police use of deadly force. And because the GBI investigator says there was police collusion to protect the officers from the consequences of a shooting he flatly asserts was not justified.
No kidding. There was nowhere for her to go.
The more I read about these cases, the more widespread the issues become. It’s not just cops murdering people, it’s the lies, corruption and cover ups, the whole system starts to look corrupt.
“Look?”
Oh, my sweet summer child…