Well, there’s your big secret that the BK security videos would have revealed - the officer briefly drove his squad car onto the sidewalk while chasing the armed suspect.
Clearly, the police had to immediately destroy the evidence to make sure nobody would ever learn the truth about what their own dashcams would reveal anyhow.
The Post’s opinion is irrelevant. What’s important is the facts it acknowledges - that both the campus PD’s investigation, and the independent investigation by the state police, found no evidence of wrongdoing or tampering in the surveillance system.
Continuing to insist on some super-secret police conspiracy in spite of the evidence against it is as intellectually honest as 9/11 trutherism or global warming denial.
That is pretty much the whole reason for this thread. Some police are committing crimes, often resulting in death or serious injury, and they are not being held accountable. I understand that you believe that police should be able to do whatever they want, kill, beat up, whatever, because in your world might makes right and if the cops say someone deserved to die then they need to die. But many of the rest of us (obviously) have a problem with the two tiered justice system we currently have.
This isn’t about me believing police can and should do whatever they want. It’s about people overreacting to appropriate uses of force because they are irrationally biased against law enforcement.
In the case being discussed, the police did nothing wrong. There was an unruly crowd on the verge of breaking out in a riot and they were maintaining order by holding a picket line when this idiot who’s either drunk or not paying attention charged right up to them and challenged their authority. He was presenting a threat to public safety and the police used appropriate force to neutralize that threat. They didn’t shoot him or Tase him or turn dogs loose on him - they just took him down with their batons so he could be handcuffed and taken away and so anyone else who was thinking about causing a scene would know what the consequences are.
The problem here is the people who are acting like this is the worst constabulatory misdeed since the Jim Crow days and insisting that multiple departments engaged in an elaborate conspiracy to cover it up.
You know, if you were my son I’d probably kill myself too. You’re a liar and somehow continually shock me with your complete disregard for truth, justice, and complete lack of humility or humanity. It’ll be a great day when you leave this board.
For the record and anyone reading, the police said McKenna attacked them and injured an office. They said his injuries were due to a horse kick. Both statements are lies and so is Smapti’s defense of them.
Trump level lying. Who are you going to believe, your eyes or people with an interest in lying?
Can you prove they were lies? Noone has perfect perception and perfect memory, especially not during a physical confrontation. It’s entirely plausible that the officers believed McKenna was throwing punches when he was just flailing his arms to protect himself (and there are parts of the video where he’s obscured and he certainly could be throwing punches), and it’s entirely plausible that an officer thought his horse kicked McKenna when in fact it didn’t.
I should’ve gone to that Duke game. I believe we won? I remember looking out of my dorm window (I lived on South Campus at the time) and seeing some of the crowd. The kid got the shit kicked out of him on Knox around the corner from my dorm. I was super glad my black ass didn’t go after seeing the cops beat that kid and pepper sprayed others I believe.
The mob did good by setting Ratsie’s on fire though. Terrible food. It’s closed now, not because of the riots, but I imagine because they finally tasted their pizza.
It’s possible (as is the involvement of aliens), but no, it’s not plausible. But it’s not your fault that you can’t tell the difference. Whatever immense trauma you endured has warped your sensibilities regarding authority beyond any reasonable sense of decency or humanity, and you’re unable to judge situations in which authority figures are involved with any human rationality or reason. It’s not your fault, but you probably should consider that this might be possible, and stop trusting that your instincts on such subjects are anything but the crazy absurd rantings of someone severely (and probably permanently) traumatically damaged.
Well… yeah. That’s what it looks like to me. Except towards the very end, where the officers do approach him a few feet - but until that point he was approaching them for some reason. I don’t need to argue over this, as it’s simply how I see the video - I could be wrong, duh.