He stole (overtly shoplifted) a single box of Swisher Sweets, and walked down the middle of a street (not an arterial). What exactly happened with the police encounter is uncertain, but calling him a “dangerous thug” seems unreasonable. Did he have a criminal/arrest record?
Because you don’t need radar to tell that someone is going over 50mph in a 25 zone?
Go re-read and try to be less stupid this time.
So you’re saying that black people speed more often when laser/radar isn’t present to track them, but white people do not? 'Cause that’s what the statistics say, taken at face value, unless there’s another explanation (like, say, some bias leading to more speeding tickets without radar/laser basis).
I guess black people must have magical radar/laser sense. Puts a new spin on the “magical negro” trope…
You keep asking questions without ever answering the questions that are asked you.
For example:
and this one:
And there’s the time where you didn’t understand that a person in a low-income job who didn’t show up to work for 96 days probably lost her job, so I asked you if you thought they held her job for her:
Maybe you should hold off asking questions until you’ve answered a few.
Wonderful news! When did that happen? Be good to know, because if you can say when, then you can say how. Which is, you could prove it. Is that what all your black friends tell you?
No? Well, then, they must be wrong, they have not confronted the facts that you have. The facts that you have not given us. But you have them! Or, if they are not wrong, then they are making shit up.
Prove it. Failing that, re-examine your certainty.
I’m not sure which would be the most troubling: that you’re ignorant or stupid enough to believe what you wrote, or that you’re dishonest enough to write it knowing that it’s flat out wrong.
Speaking of stupidity and of writing what you know is flat out wrong, I’ve long noticed you’ve had no response to my having disproved your various claims upthread.
You know, the ones where you tried to pretend you weren’t a general purpose asshole in the main but acted that way only to the likes of me?
Or where you denied that you’d said you ‘owned’ having been an asshole on the board and tried to pass off instead a post that was in reality just a self-aggrandizing bit of bullshit attacking me as being what you really said, only to have me post the exact quote and cite the post in which you made it?
To wit, I refer you to post 9672 (where you spouted most of your dishonest bullshit) and to post 9678 (where I handed you your ass).
Yet one of your most timeworn accusations toward me is one of ‘mendacity’.
It is to laugh.
It’s simple really: i decided that i didn’t want this important topic hijacked into another Sharting Fartist show. The subject matter of this thread is too important for that.
You’re a shit-flinging, paper-towel-tube-fucking dishonesty-mongering monkey, and deserve to be treated as such, but not when it detracts from the important issues we’re dealing with here.
If you would really like me to hand your ass to you in debate (yet again), please feel free to start a new Pit thread and invite me over. I can’t promise that i’ll be civil, because that would be more than a piece of shit like you deserves, but at least we could confine your idiocy to a self-contained discussion, without hijacking stuff that is too complicated for you to understand.
If you do take up my offer, i promise you that the first thing i do will be to respond to your above-mentioned post.
It’s hilarious how you suddenly became so concerned with the importance of the subject of this thread at the exact same moment I showed that virtually every claim you’d made up to that point was full of shit, as you certainly hadn’t shown any such need for constraint before then.
The rest of that little diatribe is just a bunch of hot-headed ad hominem bullshit brought about by your embarrassment over having been proven full of shit and frustration over not being able to do anything about it.
So as for me, my work here where you’re concerned is done. I’ve shown you (yet again…how many times has it been now?) to be full of shit regarding the claims you made in this thread at least and that suits me fine for now.
Shrug.
Believe what you want. If you think i care in the slightest about what you think of me, you’re mistaken. If you really do want a response to your dishonesty, start another thread and i’ll humiliate you again. If not, shut up and fuck off.
He is only threadsharting?
I can’t imagine any poster on this board more qualified to talk about stupidity than you.
On the other hand, I can’t think of any poster on this board *less *qualified than you to talk about the differences between right and wrong.
No, wait: Clothahump. Damn, I guess you’re not even successful at being the stupidest person in the room.
In 2006, the FBI warned of KKK infiltration into law enforcement. My god, a whole decade ago!
Fucking finally. Good to hear people start admitting it.
The bad examples dilute the good examples and noone ignores Walter Scott type examples its just that it gets mixed in with several Michael Brown type examples.
You can change equipment, like body cams but you aren’t going to get less racist cops if you think the problem is racism rather than lack of training. Lack of training is expensive to fix, flat out racist and some people claim is damn near impossible to fix with riots and looting.
IIRC the DOJ report was criticized in several cases for not correcting for a bunch of variables, but yeah that is a pretty racist part of the country.
Well, Jim Crow in the sense of facially discriminatory laws, is gone. Now we have the war on drugs which has mandatory sentencing for crack but a renewed appreciation for rehabilitation when white people get hooked on opiods. But technically, that’s not Jim Crow.
LOL.
That is just wretchedly dishonest. To flatly equate protesting injustice with “riots and looting” as if there were never any distinction. Are they stupid, do you think? There is an easy and orderly solution for their piddling problems, but no! No, they are stupid, they turn to violence and looting even in the face of your calm assurance that it is not necessary.
Honestly, you believe that? Do you have a vast and comprehensive knowledge of them, that entitles you? Are they protesting injustice, or just a bunch of crybabies making shit up.