…or confirm my growing conviction that my cell phone is all I need.
In July my wife and I will be spending five days in Florence and Venice, then taking a ten-day Viking cruise with stops in
- Koper, Slovenia
- Zadar, Croatia
- Dubrovnik, Croatia
- Kotor, Montenegro
- Corfu, Greece
- Katakalon, Greece
- Santorini, Greece
- Athens, Greece
followed by an additional four days in Athens.
I have a Canon 80D DSLR (24 MP) with a number of lenses, and my phone is a Samsung Galaxy S21 (12 MP). Obviously, the Canon can take superior pictures, but its equally obvious disadvantage is weight and bulk.
The old saying is “the best camera is the one you have with you.” I have to take my phone on the trip and everywhere we go. If I also lug the 80D (and an extra lens, and spare batteries) with me, I might be able to grab some higher-res shots than I could have gotten with the phone, but is that reason enough to haul it around? My initial conclusion is no.
ISTM that, aside from resolution, the chief advantage of the 80D is that it can capture better telephoto shots than the phone. I thought I might overcome that issue with a monocular which, unlike a telephoto lens, can also be used just to look at distant things by eye.
So I got one, but attaching it to the phone is a bit fiddly, the optical quality is not stellar, and handling it is also somewhat tricky, even with a pistol grip to support the whole setup. But the total weight and bulk is still less than that of the DLSR plus extra lens.
I have worked professionally as a photographer on and off for decades, but I am not a master landscape photographer, and even if I were, we will be on organized tours for much of the trip, so I won’t be entirely free to go wherever I want and take all the time I want to capture the perfect shot.
So my conclusion is to leave the DSLR at home.
Do you have any arguments to persuade me I shouldn’t?