The current near-parity of the US and Australian dollars prompts me to ask a question I have been pondering for a while.
In Oz, we have, of course, Medicare which is a form of nationalised insurance.
But people are encouraged to take out private insurance wherever possible, to keep the pressure off the public system.
I gather that in the US, private insurance is almost always arranged through the workplace, so that it is an incident of your employment that you have private health cover. And if you lose your job, you lose your cover.
Doesn’t work that way here - if you want private insurance you arrange for it yourself. The downside is paying for it yourself (of course you pay for it yourself in the US too - no doubt it gets factored in to your pay). The upside is that you get to pick whichever insurer you want, not just whoever your employer happens to have a contract with.
That background established, my private cover costs me about $115 per week. It is as close to top of the line as I can find - if I go to hospital, I have no co-pay. I still have to pay a significant portion of the bills of the doctors (as opposed to the hospital) though.
How much does it cost an employer for a similar level of cover for a worker in the US? Is it possible to get insurance outside the employment system? (Or is it generally rendered pointless given that to do so would be to get insured twice?) The American system is widely criticised for being too expensive, and the actual premium paid per person for health insurance (by whoever is paying the bill) would be a useful point of comparison.
There may be another point of distinction that distorts the market - payments here get a level of tax deductibility that may not match with the which employers get in the US, and so tax incentives could be price drivers. Are health insurance premiums paid for by employers in the US for the benefit of employees tax deductions to the employer?