Oh, all right. Let’s look at it:
Functioning government, you say? Where? There’s some Shiite operation able to hunker down inside the Green Zone, under heavy guard, yes. But it hardly controls even the Shiite sections of Baghdad, does it?
People trying to make a civil society happen, you say? I assume by that you mean a single, ethnically plural Iraq. Sure, probably lots. But they’re outnumbered, increasingly, by those whose idea of a civil society involves their own religious group in charge. And they’ve never been in the majority in Iraq anyway.
Many peaceful areas, you say? Sure, the western desert where there are no people and no oil, maybe. Kurdistan is relatively peaceful, if you’re not an Arab, that is. Where did you mean?
Commerce is continuing, you say? On what level? There are plenty of US $100 bills floating around, if that’s what you mean. Otherwise, most reports are of a subsistence-level barter economy reflecting the lack of a reliable central authority.
Reverse all of Bush’s screwups, you say? Who’s going to do that - Bush, by doing more of the same, as you so strenuously advocate? There will be too many names on the new Wall as it is, family members, friends, people we know. I do wish you weren’t so cavalier about lives other than your own; it would give your constant exhortations about what what the Americans should do with their family members’ lives at least an iota of moral credibility.
Sometimes I get a little nostalgic for the days when you were accusing those of us who opposed this from the beginning of being dupes of the neo-Trotskyites …