Could a THREE'S COMPANY reboot, done as an actual menage a trois, work in 2015>

Believable?

*Believable?
*

BELIEVABLE?

:: smacks Cal repeatedly with salmon ::

Believability is for Smurfs. Sitcoms are supposed to be funny, not realistic.

My god, next you’ll be giving pants to Wonder Woman. Pants.

In honor of this brilliant response, I have called off the assassin I sent after you yesterday morning.

Well, I sent her an text, anyway, she hasn’t replied. You, um, might want to stay inside for a while.

When my favorite niece was about 10, whenever she heard anyone say “You have a point,” she would yell back “Points are for the weak!”

Her mother blamed me just as she did for the “whoreson” fiasco.

An idea like Three’s Company seems tame compared to a show like Significant Mother. But it’s not the worst idea I’ve heard. Frankie Muniz wants to do a sequel to Malcolm in the Middle called “Malcolm in the Mid-Life Crisis.”

Heck, it happened long before your examples, back in 1968:

Hmmmm. Maybe instead of being a Serial Killer or an extraterrestrial, maybe one or more of the roommates could be (non-extraterrestrial) superheroes. It wouldn’t be as believable as an alien or a serial killer, but this is, as you say, a sitcom, so it needn’t be as plausible as a comic book.

This is why I bow to your greatness as a tribal elder. You have much to teach our youth.

They’re all actors who met while making a fantastically popular cult movie. Rumors on the set abounded and had them involved in all manner of exotic acts. In order to perpetuate their fame, they moved in together and pretended to be in a relationship, like those two women in Tatu. They’re all desperately looking for other roles so they can fire the explosive bolts and blow themselves free of this situation, but they really do work well together. It’s just off the set, and behind closed doors, that they’re The Odd Trio.

And we have our title.

Sitcoms barely work in 2015. They’re a played out form.

What could work is a premise like you have in the OP, but it’s a dumb summer comedy movie, and it’s making fun of the original show.

They want to live in an all-gay gated community, ruled with an iron fist by a flaming landlord. So they pretend to be a lesbian couple living with their gay bestie… their secret? They are all actually 100% straight! Starring: Jason Ritter, Lauren Lapkus and Gillian Jacobs. With Nathan Lane as Mister Roper.

I’ll take my five millions in cash, Hollywood.

Janet and Chrissie are a closeted lesbian couple. They get their friend Jack to stay in the spare room and pretend like he’s banging both of them, so their homophobic landlord doesn’t evict them.

One favorite Webcomic artist has wondered about that already and for a few years.

And yes, others have noticed the inspiration sources.

The artist has indeed a style similar to Japanese animation but much closer to Dan DeCarlo / Archie Comics. So much so that the Archie people has hired her from time to time to work with Archie, minus the sexy stuff of course.

It wouldn’t really be Three’s Company then. It sounds potentially interesting, but I think TV networks in some countries, specifically the USA, are not ready for that.

And sitcoms have a really hard time in the USA right now anyway.

Did you watch the show “One Big Happy” with Elisha Cuthbert as a single (gay) woman who gets artificially inseminated with her (platonic) best friend and roommate’s sperm, right about the time he suddenly gets married? That had some interesting dynamics, but it only ran what, six episodes? (Which makes me unhappy. I wish it had been a sliver better written and had a handful more success.)

I think the OP’s pitch would have similar problems.

I don’t get why you’d cast Mister Roper without casting his spouse, Mister Roper.

I think we have a winner.

This is pretty good, and probably less skeevy.

Acceptable.

Are you even trying?

John Barrowman?

I’m supposed to recreate Three’s Company for the 21st century. If I try, I’m already doing it wrong.

Gold! I’m picturing Janeane Garofalo, Marsha Warfield, and David Spade as the roommates…either Danny Devito or Kathleen Turner as their conniving agent who instigates the scheme…and maybe Oded Fehr as the persistent but inept paparazzo whose plans to out them consistently go hilariously awry…

Janet gets half the closet space in two bedrooms, instead of just one - sounds like she is coming out ahead (and presumably more often) of the other two roommates.

(bolding mine)

More’s the pity.

Merge those 2 and you have a farce. The underlying rule is that a 3-some never occurs.

Branding is reason enough to give it the same name. Especially if you make it into a movie.

An Americanized “My Hero”/“Man About the House” mashup?