I do not think so. As space expands the energy density in the universe from heat would decrease (more space, same amount of heat). Dark energy’s pressure (for lack of a better word) seems to remain constant as space expands.
Nope. The indications are that the great majority of matter in the universe is dark matter; if there was that much heat we’d know because the galaxy in question would be literally exploding like a supernova.
But that doesn’t mean you can significantly curve space without so much energy that it would be very noticeable. And, well, it’s called “dark matter” in the first place because we can’t see it.
Wouldn’t that much energy in one spot just get converted into matter anyways, like when energy was converted into protons and electrons during the Big Bang?
I don’t…think so. It’s a lot of energy, but a galaxy is really huge so it would be spread out quite a lot. But that’s a question well beyond my knowledge of physics to be sure of.
Arguably it already hasn’t, since pennies haven’t actually been even mostly copper since 1982, and haven’t been 100% copper since 1857. Yes, I’m being pedantic, but with a smile on my face–so typical for something “everybody knows” to become no longer true, such that at some point it will just seem wrong! And you kids get off of my lawn.
As I understand it, dark matter does not interact with ordinary matter; it only makes its presence known through gravity. “Heat” is photons and photons interact via electromagnetic forces. Current theory might be entirely wrong, but that’s very low probability.
Also, there are no “massless” voids, merely voids with a low number of galaxies, plus whatever dust and gas and rogue stars that are too faint to easily see with our current technology.
It really can’t be, though. Heat is the kinetic energy of a bunch of particles going in a bunch of different directions. Which means that you also have the mass of those particles. And unless the particles are moving at relativistic speeds, the heat will be much less than the rest mass.